CHURCH BOARD GUIDE TO A CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE PREVENTION POLICY
Educate the congregation about the screening program Screening programs that are “imposed” on church members rarely work. A better approach is to build support for the program through education. Sermons, Sunday school classes, newsletter articles, teacher training events, and Q&A sessions can all be used to educate, inform, and build support for the program. A membership orientation class can play an important role in sus-
taining the program over time and reducing the potential for conflict. During the orientation, all church policies concerning sexual abuse prevention should be explained. During that time, explain the thresh- old requirements for volunteer service with children and youth. Give each member a copy of the volunteer application and review it with them. Later, if a church member is called upon for nursery duty or some other responsibility involving children or youth and is asked to complete the form, he or she will understand what is being asked and why it is being asked. No one will be surprised or caught off guard by the screening policy.
2. Supervising Church Workers
Churches can be held liable on the basis of negligent supervision. Screening is the first line of defense in the protection of children, and in defending the church against an allegation of negligent selection.
The problem of negligent supervision Screening is only one part of a larger protection strategy. While a church can do an outstanding job selecting workers, it can still be found negligent if a child is hurt or molested during a church activity, and the church fails to provide adequate levels of supervision. Negligence means carelessness or failing to exercise reasonable
care. Negligent supervision is often used as a basis for liability against a church when children are molested. No church can guarantee the safety of every child who participates
in church programs. Injuries are bound to occur, regardless of the level of supervision. Negligence occurs when a church fails to provide a rea- sonable level of supervision. In such cases, a church may be found liable.
28
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74