search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CHURCH BOARD GUIDE TO A CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE PREVENTION POLICY


service and good reputation. Other times they are new attendees or loners who have few friends. One thing is clear—to protect children, churches must also screen volunteers.


Roadblocks to screening While most churches can implement a screening program for paid employees without a great deal of difficulty, the same is not true for the screening of volunteers. This is true for a number of reasons. Some church leaders do not believe anyone in their church would


harm a child. This is especially true among smaller congregations where members are more likely to know one another. A passive accep- tance may exist concerning the problem of child sexual abuse, but church leaders feel no need to address it at the congregational level. Our research indicates that smaller churches, especially those located in rural settings and small towns, are the least likely to screen volun- teers. Leadership training is needed to address this concern. Some church leaders feel that screening is an invasion of privacy


that alienates potential volunteers. Screening involves asking personal questions, and in some cases collecting fingerprints and doing criminal records checks. When such requirements are imposed on volunteers, who are serving out of goodwill to start with, they may respond negatively and decide not to serve. To a large degree, this problem solves itself when there is a clear focus and shared understanding of why the church screens— namely, to protect children. Parents want their children safe. Churches that promote a commitment to safety nurture support for screening. Rather than becoming an obstacle that alienates volunteers, screening becomes an asset that attracts members who want to be part of a caring church that safeguards their children. This is especially true in light of all the media coverage churches have received regarding this problem. Some church leaders view screening as being unmanageable since they


use so many volunteers for varied purposes, occasions, and frequencies of service. The problem becomes an administrative one that leads to paral- ysis and inaction regarding any form of screening. This obstacle has been solved in many churches and other organizations that work with children. Plenty of models of how to do screening exist, and with a little research and investigation, any church can organize an effective screening plan. Some churches start a program, but cannot sustain it. Often this hap-


pens when a church has one or two people who care deeply about the problem of child sexual abuse, and champion the cause of screening in the


21


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74