This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
RESEARCH


Clubs competing in the Champions League reported revenues three times above the Premier League average


Premier League matchday revenue decreased marginally in 2011-12 due to lower attendances The bigger story is the substantially increased


revenue accruing to clubs as a result of the broadcast deals from the start of the 2013-14 season


£54m and Manchester United up £14m. The other four ‘big six’ clubs – Arse- nal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Tottenham Hotspur – all increased their commercial revenue in 2011-12. The combined £21m increase demonstrates continued global demand for association with the top Premier League clubs. Outside the ‘big six’ clubs, only the


three promoted clubs and Wigan Athletic grew commercial revenue in 2011-12, highlighting the challenge for those Pre- mier League clubs without significant global profile when it comes to upwardly negotiating deals or extending the range of their commercial partners.


MATCHDAY Matchday revenue decreased margin- ally to £547m in 2011-12. This is only the second time Premier League matchday revenue has gone down since we started analysing revenues across the three streams in 1996-97. Attendances across the Premier League


in 2011-12 were marginally down on 2010-11 and the economic climate con- tinues to challenge clubs to be prudent in setting ticket prices and exerting pres- sure on the corporate hospitality market. At 23 per cent of total Premier League


revenue, matchday revenue is now the smallest of the three revenue catego- ries and looks set to remain so for the


foreseeable future. From 2013/14 and the first year of the new round of broadcast deals, this revenue is forecast to con- tribute less than 2 per cent to the total – compared with 48 per cent in 91/92, the season before the Premier League started. Nonetheless, the Premier League clubs’ matchday revenue will still be the highest in Europe in absolute terms.


REVENUE PROFILES Average revenue per Premier League club in 2011-12 was £118m (2010-11: £114m), split between matchday (£27m), broadcast (£60m) and commercial (£31m) revenue streams. This simple average masks the signifi-


cant polarisation that exists between different groups of clubs in the division. The four clubs competing in the


Champions League (Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City and Manchester United) and two others – Liverpool and Totten- ham Hotspur – had average revenue of £230m between them in 2011-12 – over three times the average revenue (£70m) of the other 14 clubs in the Premier League. Qualification for the Champions League remains a key revenue diferentia- tor among the top Premier League clubs, effectively guaranteeing them at least £30m in additional revenue from UEFA distributions and associated matchday and commercial uplifts.


28 Read Sports Management online sportsmanagement.co.uk/digital The average revenue of clubs in the


Championship was £20m in 2011-12. This was made up of an average of nearly £30m for the seven clubs which were in receipt of parachute payments and £16m for those who were not.


LOOKING FORWARD 2012/13 is expected to see another year of modest revenue growth in the Premier League. Three things are driving this: size- able increases in the commercial revenues at some clubs; increased attendances and improved matchday revenue from the change in club mix within the Premier League; and modest growth from broad- cast deals. These changes are expected to take revenues up to nearly £2.5bn. The bigger story is the substantially


increased revenue accruing to clubs as a result of the new broadcast deals from the start of the 2013/14 season. The total value of the new broadcast rights pack- ages, including domestic and overseas


Issue 2 2013 © cybertrek 2013


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84