What’s in a Name? Kingswear
It’s a small, friendly and beautiful place – they call it ‘the sunny side’ due to it catching the sun’s rays for much of the day.
K
The village is younger than Dartmouth, by more than 100 years – but neither are mentioned in the Domesday Book.
The ‘King’ from the name comes from Kingston, a village on the plateau above the village – NOT the Kingston near Modbury, by the way. The ‘Wear’ is actually related to a tidal mill that used weirs to control the water in and out and allow more regular power for its corn grinding in Waterhead Creek. It worked in a very similar way to Dartmouth’s ‘Fosse’ letting water into the Mill Pool – creating not only a place to produce food and employment, but also a beating heart to the community.
It is no coincidence that this technological innovation, which allowed the inhabitants of the area to create their own food also helped the village to become established.
Although there were settlements in the area in Stone Age times, it is only in 1170 – 23 years after a huge fleet left for the Crusades from the Harbour – that the existence of Kingswear is first recorded. The town was supported not only by its mill but also as a landing point for pilgrims from Europe looking to visit the shrine of Thomas Beckett, murdered in 1170 by followers of his then enemy King Henry II. The murderers took the King’s cry ‘will no one rid me of this turbulent Priest?!” to heart.
Thanks to its association with the pilgrimage the village’s church was dedicated to St Thomas after the Pope canonized him.
The village has developed over the years, with a ferry to Dartmouth running since at least 1365. However it has never become a hub of trade and population like Dartmouth.
Why is this? No one knows for sure, as it offers a quicker route to the Exeter Road and is, of course, bathed in sunshine for more of the day than its darker, western neighbour.
Even when the railway arrived in 1864, pushed towards Dartmouth by the inimitable Isambard
ingswear residents are rightfully proud of their village.
Kingdom Brunel, the village didn’t grow much beyond its current size.
But I think the reason is simply the geography of the land, and the fact that the Dartmouth population made massive changes to their land, allowing more development, and Kingswear’s residents didn’t. Dartmouth and Kingswear both had tidal mills, Kingswear’s on Waterhead Creek, Dartmouth’s across the Mill Pool, made possible by the ‘Fosse’ or dam across its creek. Because of the larger gap between Dartmouth’s two protruding hills, Hardness and Clifton, this created a larger opportunity for creating flat land suitable for building on. Dartmouth developed its waterfront, slowly grabbing more and more land from the river. Kingswear’s geography, with its steeper hills, smaller creek and dense woodland presented more challenges for potential builders – there was more work involved and less land to develop and grab. So when the Dartmothians filled in the Mill Pool in the early 19th century, Waterhead Creek still remains. The nearest the village ever came to emulating
Dartmouth’s massive land-creation programme was in the 1960s, when the Parish Council got within one vote of buying Waterhead Creek to solve its rubbish disposal problems. The councilors wanted to slowly fill in the Creek with the village’s rubbish, and when it was filled in, landscape it into a public space. Sadly, the main reason the councilors DIDN’T commit this massive act of vandalism and pollution was because the cost was too high, as they would have had to manage the whole project themselves. I think anyone looking at the beautiful creek today will be thankful they doubted their own ability to manage the project, as it is a wonderful place for locals and tourists – arriving on the still-running Steam Railway - alike.
Kingswear now has a unique charm, and a fierce loyalty among its inhabitants. This is partly due to its size and unique location, separated from both Dartmouth and Torbay because of its geography. Beautiful, unique and with a small and committed community, Kingswear’s current residents can be grateful their forebears never decided to build out into the river in the way their counterparts in Dartmouth did.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144