208 REFERENCES
Cogneau, D., and A. S. Robilliard. 2000. Income distribution, poverty and growth in Madagascar: Microsimulations in a general equilibrium framework. IFPRI Working Paper 61/2000. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Collier, P. 1999. On the economic consequences of civil war. Oxford Economic Papers 51 (1): 168–183.
Datt, G., D. Jolliffe, and M. Sharma. 1998. A profile of poverty in Egypt: 1997. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper 49. Washington, D.C.: Inter- national Food Policy Research Institute.
Decaluwé, B., A. Patry, L. Savard, and E. Thorbecke. 1999. Poverty analysis within a gen- eral equilibrium framework. Cahiers de recherche 9909. Université Laval, Quebec: Département d’Économique.
Decreux, Y., and H. Valin. 2007. MIRAGE: Updated version of the model for trade policy analysis: Focus on agriculture and dynamics. CEPII Working Paper 2007-15. Paris: Centre d’Études Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales.
de Gorter, H., M. Ingco, and L. Ignacio. 2004. Domestic support: Economics and policy instruments. In Agriculture and the WTO: Creating a trading system for develop- ment, ed. M. Ingco and J. Nash. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Dennis, A. 2006a. The impact of regional trade agreements and trade facilitation in the Middle East and North Africa Region. Policy Research Working Paper 3837. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
———. 2006b. Trade liberalization, factor market flexibility, and growth: The case of Morocco and Tunisia. Policy Research Working Paper 3857. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Dessus, S., K. Fukasaku, and R. Safadi. 1999. La liberalisation multilatérale des droits de douane et les pays en développement. Cahier de Politique Economique 18. Paris: Centre de Développement de de l’Organisation de Cooperation et de Devel- oppement Economique.
Devarajan, S., and S. Robinson. 2002. The influence of computable general equilib- rium models on policy. Trade and Macroeconomic Division Discussion Paper 98. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Devarajan, S., D. Go, and H. Li. 1999. Quantifying the fiscal effects of trade reform: A general equilibrium model estimated for 60 countries. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Mimeo.
Diao, X., A. Somwaru, and T. Roe. 2001. A global analysis of agricultural trade reform in WTO member countries. Economic Development Center 01-1. Bulletin 12984. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Diaz-Bonilla, E., M. Thomas, S. Robinson, and A. Cattaneo. 2000. Food security and trade negotiations in the World Trade Organization: A cluster analysis of country groups. Trade and Macroeconomics Division Discussion Paper 59. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Elbehri, A., J. Umstaetter, and D. Kelch. 2008. The EU sugar policy regime and impli- cations of reform. Report 59. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Agri- culture (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS). July. <
http://www.ers.usda.gov/ Publications/ERR59/err59_reportsummary.pdf>.
El-Laithy, H., M. Lokshin, and A. Banerji. 2003. Poverty and economic growth in Egypt,
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242 |
Page 243 |
Page 244 |
Page 245 |
Page 246 |
Page 247 |
Page 248 |
Page 249 |
Page 250 |
Page 251 |
Page 252