This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
| INDUSTRY SURVE Y | 03


RE R EADER SURVEY F INDINGS


THE 24/7 CAMPUS Today’s modern campuses often offer all the facilities needed, such as shops, restaurants, sports facilities and green spaces, to be atractive to both students spending more time on campus and the local community. In the survey, we asked our readers if it is a good idea to turn university facilities into these 24/7 campuses. The result was 64% in favour


of developing 24/7 campuses for the future, rising to 78% when we asked people working in university commercial services and business development teams: so, perhaps


SHOULD WE OFFER 24/7 FACILITIES?


unsurprisingly, those in charge of developing further income for universities feel this is a good avenue to go down. This majority in favour of 24/7 campuses


is perhaps a reflection of the great potential for developing university facilities as revenue generators for the future. It also suggests that the more time students spend on campus, the more they will need longer and constant access to facilities. We also asked whether the move towards two-year degrees (where three-year courses are consolidated into two via more concentrated teaching time) will mean students


stay on campus for longer during the day and need more on-site learning spaces and facilities. With the majority of respondents –


22% Yes & my university is already 24/7 42% Yes & my university is not 24/7 4% No & my university is a 24/7 campus 22% No & my university is not 24/7 10% Don’t know


 FEEDBA C K


“It’s a fine line; additional revenue streams can make a sound contribution to operational costs. Universities should look at the social demography as they do have a social responsibility and an


economic contribution to the local community. However the balance has to be carefully managed in order for the university to operate without detracting from its core values and identity.” Survey respondent


“With government funding being slashed it is essential for universities to now


collaborate with local communities. This will benefit the onsite shops and encourage students to support the local amenities too.” Survey respondent


A RE S P O N S I B LE SE C TO R


SHIFTING STUDENT PROFILES In our survey, we wanted to find out whether lifting the UK student cap for universities in 2015 would or could affect the profile of students in the UK.


64% 23%


said there would be a slight change in profile


said there would be a significant change in profile


We also questioned whether in the scenario that more UK students chose to live at home while studying – and more international students came to the UK


and stayed on campus – how much would this change the nature of the on-site population, specifically at evenings and weekends?


57% 35%


said there would be a slight change in profile


said there would be a significant change in profile


Fiona Martin added: "Although views were split over the extent to which it will happen, the demographic profile of students seems set to evolve.


Those responsible for managing and developing onsite facilities should factor this in to ensure the campus offer remains relevant to their student profile in the years ahead.”


“The demographic profile  FEEDBACK


of students seems set to evolve” Aramark


61% - believing that two-year courses will result in students spending longer on campus, facilities may need to be extended and improved, both in regards to services and support facilities.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102