search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SHOP SOLUTIONS


Boring Turning Milling Drilling Holding


The dual overlapping laser technology developed and patented by SLM Solutions enables two lasers to work simultaneously on the part in the overlap area, producing not only a faster build but a larger part as well. The company carried out tests on these overlap areas showing there is no difference in quality between the area built exclusively by one laser and the area in the overlap worked on by both lasers interchangeably. SLM Solutions engineers went through sev- eral iterations to prepare the fi le and build some sample test pieces to see if the job could achieve the customer’s goal of cost and time savings, as well as weight reduction.


Standard Tools ultradexusa.com AFTER BEFORE


Custom Builds Repairs Detail Work


Specialty Tools ultra-dex.com High Performance Tools


Titanium aerospace blades were manufactured by Sintavia LLC (Davie, FL) using SLM 280HL 3D printing technology from SLM Solutions (Novi, MI).


In general, aerospace/aircraft requirements for inspection


are quite extensive, usually involving a computed tomog- raphy scan, a nondestructive test method, to check for porosity or voids in the part, or the customer may perform destructive testing by cutting up the part. “We used nonde- structive testing on this part, then performed a real-world test by mounting it on an engine in its intended use, and running it until it failed,” Hansen said.


A Division of:


While 3D printing tends to get attention for its ability to build unique geometries, the nature of this aircraft component was not particularly complex. However, manufacturing a part of that size in titanium in such a short time was something that could not have been achieved had the part been ma- chined out of a billet. “With additive manufacturing you’re not restricted to traditional tools and machinery, so you can design in more organic shapes and the entire cycle of designing and engineering a critical part for the aircraft industry is condensed considerably,” Hansen said. According to Richard Grylls, head of the applications engineering department/North America technical director, “The part’s size meant that it would have taken several weeks


42 AdvancedManufacturing.org | February 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100