search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Flash the raccoon is no ordinary animal. He’s one of Scotland’s most-loved ‘therapets’ – an animal whose presence has a therapeutic value, particularly for older folk and children with learning or developmental difficulties. He is owned by Sean Carr and Liana Kontou of Party Animals, a great business in West Lothian that won the 2015 West Lothian’s ‘Favourite Business’ award.


So when the rumour started flying around that Flash was “about to be deported under new EU legislation”, you can imagine how many worried constituents, as well as local MSP Angela Constance and local MP Hannah Bardell, got in touch to ask me to intervene.


This is why we need to talk about the EU. Complex documents writen by folk who only speak European Legalese being filtered through a media that doesn’t have the resources (or in some cases, the inclination) to sort the meat from the gristle is a recipe for disaster.


Now, let’s use Flash as an example of how the EU really works.


The proposed Alien Invasive Species Regulation by the European Commission would have outlined measures to ban certain plants and animals from Europe. We need to protect native biodiversity, so December 2014 saw the European Parliament agree with the Council of Ministers and the European Commission and pass primary legislation on invasive alien species.


The legislation placed a responsibility upon the Commission to submit a draſt implementing act by January 2016 laying down the list of species considered invasive.


But these proposed laws were widely criticised as covering too many, too few, or simply the wrong species, and of not giving enough clarity on the implications for animals.


Ordinarily, legislation can’t pass without the European Parliament voting in favour, but this Regulation would have been adopted via implementing acts. The decisions requiring implementing acts are complex and require expert knowledge that most MEPs simply don’t have, which is why we can’t just throw them out. But we can object to them and make the Commission reconsider if we feel it has exceeded its powers or simply got it wrong.


I hadn’t heard much about therapets 40 February 2016 Young Flash


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100