This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
bulls on the market? The answer is no, there is much more involved in improving locomotion than just these traits. Although looking at bulls that transmit superior locomotion is a step in the right direction it is important when breeding not to focus on one single trait to the detriment of others. Locomotion is strongly infl uenced by the overall structure and balance of the animal. Being structurally correct through the rump, thurl and spine is vital as this is the hinge from which the rear legs operate. While being correctly structured through the front legs and shoulders as well as being balanced through the chest and heart give the shape from which the stride is formed. Take for example chest width, an animal may have great shape to it’s rear legs, with great bone quality and the ability to fl ex it’s legs well, but if the front end is not built correctly for the rear end to follow then the animal will still struggle with it’s locomotion.


It is important when correctively mating


Higher Locomotion Linear score:


Increased Lifetime Yield Increased Yield per day Increased longevity Aim for extreme of 9


for locomotion to understand the structure of the animal you are working with. Classifi cation is the best way to focus on structure, which in turn marries accurate, independent information collected on the female with the transmitting ability of the sire. The data contributing to the predicted transmitting ability (PTA) is made up from the same data collection strategy. Therefore, the best way to improve any trait on a cow is not necessarily just about picking a bull that is a strong transmitter, but more concentrating on the faults of the cow and applying the right bulls in the right places.


Profi tability: 1ppl profi t


£169 for 1 v 9 /cow £33,770 /200 cows


Assuming the average value and ‘Top 25%’ profi t per litre as 1 pence





Being structurally correct through the rump, thurl and spine is vital as this is the hinge from which the rear legs operate


’ THE JOURNAL JUNE 2015 45


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112