search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FLOOD NEWS


ACO adopts innovativeappr oach for Small-ScaleSuDS Application


When the South East Rivers Trust was tasked with delivering a water attenuation solution for two SuDS planters at a school in Sutton, it took the opportunity to explore innovative solutions and compare different technological approaches to the challenge.Here, we look at how an ACO RoofBloxx geocellular storage crate has helped to provide a flexible sustainable option for the smaller-scale project.


As part of an initiative set up to reduce flood risk in the area, the London Borough of Sutton and the South East Rivers Trust are collaborating on a SuDS raised planter project at a school in Sutton. With funding from the Environment Agency, it will ensure that water entering the nearby River Wandle is cleaner and improves the environment for local wildlife.


The project involved two plant boxes being installed outside one of the priority schools, Carshalton High School for Girls. The plant boxes required water attenuation solutions to store and subsequently release rainfall into the sewer network. Engineers at the South East Rivers Trust approached ACO Building Drainage to ensure the most appropriate solution was selected.


Thinking outsidethebox


A common approach to delivering sub-base storage is to use a simple gravel layer, but as Ed Byers at the South East Rivers Trust explains, this particular project offered a unique opportunity to trial an alternative approach:


“We decided to compare two technologies: opting for gravel in one planter, and geocellular storage crates as the sub-base layer in the other. We knew that this would increase the void space when compared with gravel – offering approximately 90% volume versus 30%. This ultimately ensured we could meet the required storage capacity for the planters, as specified in the designs.


“We selected ACO RoofBloxx, because of its ability to stack, which was important due to the height of the planters. It was one of the few products available that met the requirements. They’re stackable, sufficiently flexible to be used at different heights, and easy to cut, all of which helped maximise the space within the planter.


“RoofBloxx is a great value product and provides more storage than a simple gravel layer. It is also available in relatively small quantities, which makes it ideal for smaller-scale projects where


16 | August 2021 | www.draintraderltd.com large volumes of stock are not required.


Measuring performance As part of the project, the South East Rivers Trust will compare the performance of RoofBloxx with a more traditional gravel layer. Four pressure transducers have been installed to measure water levels across the plant boxes, which are combined with v-notch plates to measure flow in and out of the planters. This is set to provide data on the relative ability of attenuation solutions to store and slow down the flow of water into the sewer network.


Adam Cane, Knowledge Manager at ACO, comments: “This is a unique approach to what is a fairly common application. This will enable the trust to make informed decisions, and ultimately provide informative guidance to industry in the future.”


“Monitoring of the boxes will continue for a year. South East Rivers Trust’s innovative approach is a fantastic example how different organisations can work together. Support from expert product manufacturers such as, ACO Water Management, can help deliver the technological advancements required to meet varied challenges.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88