search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COMMENT


IBS Journal March 2017


43


FIs can’t afford to put all eggs in the MiFID II basket


Volker Lainer, VP of Product Management, GoldenSource


With so much deliberation and debate about the best approach to take in order to be MiFID II ready, it is easy to put aside the other compliance requirements facing FIs this year. From the big banks to brokers and asset managers of all sizes, the underlying problem is trying to keep pace with a flurry of different compliance and governance demands, including AIFMD, BCBS 239 and Solvency II.


The problem is that in response to an increasingly more complex regulatory landscape, many of these firms have looked to deploy individual solutions to meet different requirements. Unfortunately, this approach has only created silos of duplicated effort, data spend, infrastructure and governance. And there is a bigger problem around the corner if firms continue down this path. For example, under Basel 239, banks are required to house all their information in one place, with tight governance frameworks wrapped around the data. However, if at the same time, a bank is solving MiFID II issues through a separate data repository, they will be, by definition, moving further away from Basel 239.


The industry is also waiting for clarity around another data repository – Financial Instruments Reference Data System (FIRDS). FIRDS, which covers the full range of financial instruments under MiFID II, is a brand-new feed that every FI will have to either contribute to or consume from. In this case, the challenge will be trying to keep all their records up to data as and when the feed comes through. To date, while there is important information about what needs to be submitted to the APAs and the consolidated tape providers, the rest of the industry is still somewhere in the


dark about how detailed the feed will be. Once more, the issue of duplication rears its ugly head. On the one hand, banks will be sourcing FIRDS information directly from ESMA, but on the other, it will also be receiving the similar information from the likes of Bloomberg and Reuters who will be augmenting the data intra-day.


All this raises the question, can FIs realistically rely on a fragmented approach to regulation? It would seem that transforming data on the fly and shaping it for individual requirements is too light touch – requiring constant out-of-the-box fixes to ascertain a single view of the truth. In addition, absorbing new data and moving it to more destinations, as with FIRDS, also compounds this problem. This prompts an even more pertinent question, if the current tactical approach isn’t working, is it not wiser to take a less is more approach going forward?


It certainly can be, but only with better data practices alongside solutions that scale. The good news, for those seeking an alternative approach, is that fragmented data management point solutions can also be consolidated through a flexible data model. This is combined with a common approach to governance that, crucially, can, be applied across all regulations. This should make life a whole lot easier for FIs – as it is much easier to locate the right information, at the right place, at the right time when it is fully understood, documented, and instantly comparable and available for modelling and reporting on demand.


Regardless of the regulation in question, those that have one way to comprehensively cover the data management aspects of all regulations will be better placed than those who continue to adopt a more fragmented approach.


www.ibsintelligence.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56