This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Annex 3 Supply Chain Case Studies 3.1 East AngliaMetMasts


Overview


In order to accurately predict the wind resource available in the EA zone, EA1 installed twometmasts. The Shareholders sought to capture learning fromthe delivery of themet masts, but also seized upon the opportunity to work with new suppliers to the renewable energy industry – thus supporting longer termgoals of expanding support for UK project delivery. Themasts were technically challenging, but also presented a significant supply chain opportunity, being installed in 43mof water depth, reaching to a height of over 100mand located 40 to 60miles fromthe nearest ports. Through the delivery of themetmasts the Project achieved the following successes:


Competition


 Main contract awarded on EPC basis following broadmarket engagement exercise. 7 tenders received. Standard contract terms and conditions adjusted in some areas to allow wider participation in delivery.


 TheWood Group was awarded themain contract for supply and installation, equating to £17M. Expanding the UK Supply Chain by giving an opportunity to an established UK Oil and Gas company to bring their knowledge and experience to the renewables sector.


 Steel Engineering and TAG awarded sub-contracts for themajor elements ofmanufacturing. UK manufacturers achieved the awards formonopile and transition piece delivery.


Innovation


 At over 40mwater depth, one of the deepest watermonopiles installed in the renewables industry. Conical shape employed in design to save costs and reduce weights – learning employed on other projects.


 Designwas executed by Ramboll in their London office. Technical review was also UK based, (Offshore Design Engineering, GHGL and London Offshore Consultants).


 Integratedmonopile andmetmast design determined by the Shareholders in house team of experts. Integrated design safer andmore robust than separate designs that have been prone to failure.


Skills


 Utilisation of East Anglia ports for O&Msupport – 5 years planned.  Development of new integrated design techniques, which will deliver long termsolutions that aremore robust and cost effective than the traditional approach.


ANNEX 3


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87