Consultee
Table
25.1.Consultation Responses Date /Document
The Planning Inspectorate on behalf of the Secretary of State
SCOPING OPINION: Proposed East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm(The Planning Inspectorate December 2012).
Comment
‘The setting of cultural heritage resources could be affected; this includes historic buildings, historic landscapes and archaeological sites and the Secretary of State considers that these should be addressed in the ES. Cross reference should be made to the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment section of the ES. The selection of the viewpoints within the LVIA should incorporate views from cultural heritage locations and should be agreed with the relevant authorities’ (Paragraph 3.101).
Response / where addressed in the PEIR
The known and potential effect on the archaeological and cultural heritage resource is considered below drawing on data presented in Technical Appendix 25.1.
Full cross referencing and integration to the LVIA Appendix 29.1 and Chapter 29 Seascape, Landscape and Visual Amenity will be undertaken once completed.
English Heritage
SCOPING OPINION: Proposed East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm(The Planning Inspectorate December 2012).
‘We require any Environmental Statement produced in support of these proposed projects to:
· assess direct impacts upon historic or archaeological marine or terrestrial sites and areas, whether statutorily protected or not;
· determine any indirect impacts, particularly the setting of listed buildings, scheduled monuments, conservation areas etc., including change to historic landscape and seascapes character from the cumulative development of the East Anglia Zone; and
· detail the potential to encounter buried archaeology as revealed by both desk-based analysis of available records (national and local) and interpretation of geophysical and geotechnical marine survey data’ (Appendix 2).
Suffolk County Council
SCOPING OPINION: Proposed East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm(The Planning Inspectorate
‘The surveys that have been completed along the corridor to date are sufficient to determine the application in relation to the corridor only. If consent is forthcoming, a full field evaluation will then be required along the corridor to inform the mitigation strategy. As the county council has stated for EA ONE, systematic evaluation is crucial to enable the scheme of archaeological investigation/requirements to be accurately defined. This is likely to consist of avoidance (in some cases), full excavation in others (in advance of
Preliminary Environmental Information April 2014
East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm
The known and potential effect on the archaeological and cultural heritage resource is considered below drawing on data presented in Technical Appendix 25.1.
Chapter 25 Onshore Archaeology Page 3
The known and potential effect on the archaeological and cultural heritage resource is considered below drawing on data presented in Technical Appendix 25.1.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49