This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
162. There is the possibility of low level interaction with adults migrating through the East Anglia Zone from feeding grounds in the North Sea to the Downs sub stock main spawning grounds in the Eastern Channel.


163.


ICES (2013) also advises that the North Sea herring stock is currently at full reproductive capacity and it is harvested sustainably with increases of over 95 per cent in the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) for 2012.


164. Any temporary noise effects resulting from piling are therefore not expected to contribute to changes in spawning activity or an increase in mortality that would be detrimental to the Downs sub-population or to the North Sea herring stock as a whole and therefore the magnitude is expected to be low.


165. As spawning activity is highly variable year on year, driven largely by environmental variables (Hufnagl and Peck 2011), and as herring are a highly mobile species any avoidance of the noise impact area during piling is not expected to result in exclusion of individuals from the wider available spawning locations and so a low sensitivity has been assumed. This is further supported by the fact that herring have been reported to relocate to alternative spawning locations between generations (Schmidt et al. 2009).


166. In view of the above, an impact of minor adverse significance is expected to occur.


Sprat 167. With respect to potential impacts on spawning aggregations, sprat utilise coastal and offshore waters during spawning and release their eggs into the water column (Whitehead1986). As a result spawning grounds are widespread around the North Sea and not limited to areas with specific characteristics (Figure 11.60). The magnitude of any effect is considered to be low with a receptor sensitivity equivalent to that of herring i.e. low. The predicted significance of the impact of piling noise causing behavioural effects in sprat is therefore assessed as being of minor adverse significance.


Sandeels 168. Monitoring of lesser sandeels during seismic surveys showed some behavioural reactions to source levels equivalent to 210 dB at 1 mPa (Hassel et al. 2004). After the seismic shooting had ceased however, normal behaviour resumed (Hassel et al. 2004).


169. As no increase in mortality or injurious effects were observed in treatment groups (exposed to seismic shooting) over control groups (not exposed to seismic activity), and no reduction in sandeel abundance in grab surveys was observed after the


Preliminary Environmental Information May 2014


East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm


Chapter 11 Fish and Shellfish Page 64


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111