search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
20


INSIGHTS


Architects need to work alongside manufacturers to ensure all elements are being built according to brief


Quality control


Beyond expansion and standardisation, just how far offsite methods are able to control construction quality is an aspect that has historically raised questions from lenders and clients alike, but perceptions are shifting, with the method now being sold on the basis of guarantees of quality. “I think we are moving past the reputational problems that prefabrication had and into an era where good quality is expected,” says Rory Bergin, partner at HTA Design – the practice behind some of London’s landmark modular buildings, including the 90 metre student accommodation facility Apex House in north London (pictured), which recently topped out after a reasonably swift 13-week lift and fit procedure. “It’s much easier to guarantee the quality of a product made in a factory than it is on site,” Bergin claims, adding, “The building standards are much higher, we have much tougher standards for structural and environmental performance, we know much more about testing regimes and building design lives. The industry has learned a tremendous amount from the failure of building technol- ogy in the last 50-60 years; you have to be careful though that the products you use have been tested, accredited and meet the right standards.” Carr goes further: “Today you expect perfection, and that is down to manufacturing through the assembly line process in factory conditions. There’s absolutely no reason why building something in a factory should have a shorter lifespan than something delivered on site.”


Asked about the quality control procedures followed on HTA’s schemes, Bergin reveals this is no arms-length process for architects who instead need to work alongside manufacturers to ensure all elements are built according to brief, often with tests being carried out on a reference model. “It’s not a case of us doing some drawings and sending them off and then waiting for them to turn up (as modules); it’s a continuous conversation.” He admits once architects have nailed down the specification manufacturers become responsible for the structure – however, architects need to carry out the technical supervision of the construction process.


Design challenges


Within the design realm, flexibility and cost are closely linked. In education, where modular construction is often used to deliver whole facilities or extensions, it’s vital to have clarity on the design from the project’s inception.


This is because adapting a project for modular at later stages can prove costly. “It’s not really that adaptable,” says Maari, “so if you are looking to expand, then it’s difficult to use that system.” He adds: “Getting the thermal massing is also quite difficult – if you’re going for a well-ventilated building, it’s challenging to get all the shafts and holes in the right places unless you plan ahead.” He concludes, “There are interfaces that need to be traditionally done and spans that can’t be modular; these still have to be an adapta- tion between modular and traditional build.” Flexible modular solutions must arguably be on the table however if offsite is to enjoy mainstream success in the residential sector. “Manufacturers recognise sites are not always square or rectangular; you have to be able to deal with different angles and


shapes and planning requirements that drive us towards more complex building shapes than heavily-engineered system would want,” claims Bergin. He says the type of construction doesn’t need to affect the quality of design either: “There are two approaches: to make the building ‘look manufactured’ or like a building where the fact that it’s been manufactured is more or less invisible. We want to make buildings that look ‘normal’ – we don’t try to emphasise their being modular.”


Combining offsite with different types of frame, such as cross- laminated timber, also calls for a degree of discipline, architects believe. As Bergin puts it, “I think good design comes out of constraints – I don’t think it’s ever come out of a blank piece of paper on an empty site and a complete freedom to express yourself,” he says. “The projects architects are most proud of are the ones in which they have had to use their ingenuity.”


Mainstream success?


So will offsite construction finally take off in housing? Bergin says that change will be driven by Government backing: “Things are moving quickly and the Government’s £2bn Accelerated Construction initiative is aimed at supporting that and giving people a strong reason to invest in factories.” Maari, however, remains sceptical about any large-scale success, despite admitting the use of offsite construction is bound to grow due to the skills shortage as well as the increased cost of materials being witnessed currently. He says: “I can see it working with social housing and the like but not in the mainstream residential market. It’s taken off in North America because they see housing as a product – there you can pick your home from a catalogue – this is not the ethos in the UK and I can’t see it changing.” For Carr, targeting a specific sector, such as Build to Rent, is the way forward to drive large-scale adoption of offsite. “It’s predictable and tends to be funded by institutional investors and you’ve got a repetitive model; of course, you can apply creativity within that.” He highlights the fact that adopting standard criteria can lead to ‘enormous savings’ and create housing that’s environ- mentally friendly and constructed in a safe manner. Concluding, Carr says: “It seems to me modular is the logical conclusion of centuries of researching into how things work best.”


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


ADF MAY 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84