search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Propane and CNG continue to lead the way in terms of the alt-fuel options school districts are choosing. Kyrene Elementary School District No. 28 in Phoenix recently upped its investment in propane with a new order of 73 school buses.


ics to repair various technologies on both the buses and at the pump. “It was saving us money when diesel was expensive. But training costs are up, and CNG is now the same per gallon as diesel.” For now, the district uses CNG buses for shorter special education routes, while the rest are utilized as backup transportation.


Cost Advantage of Propane A byproduct of oil refining and natural gas processing,


propane has become an attractive alternative due to its availability and the lower entry cost for fueling infra- structure. Outside of Phoenix, the Kyrene School District now


runs 85 percent of its school bus fleet on propane au- togas. Te school district first adopted the fuel in 2014 when it purchased 25 Blue Bird Vision Propane-Powered buses. Tis spring, it added 73 more. Equipped with a Ford 6.8L V10 engine, the 98 buses are powered by ROUSH CleanTech propane autogas fuel systems. Currently, the district averages $1.15 per gallon


See Us At Booth 258


compared with $1.50 per gallon for diesel. In addition, the district benefits from a 36 cents per gallon tax rebate provided by the federal government. And a propane provider is helping to install an onsite fuel station to further reduce the cost per gallon. Drivers also like the quieter ride. “Tis allows


drivers to better interact and talk with students on the bus without competing with a diesel engine,” said Eric Nethercutt, director of transportation and facilities for Kyrene School District.


 48 School Transportation News • JULY 2016


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100