search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Trends


IDLING FLEETS WRITTEN BY SEAN GALLAGHER | SEAN@STNONLINE.COM School Transportation News reached out to transportation


directors and supervisors to gain insight into the topic of idling. More than 200 respondents steered STN towards the trend that most fleets are now required by local or state rules to idle for no more than five minutes.


A benefit of these policies is that operational costs have been drastically decreased, with more than 85 percent of responses pointing to this tendency. Michelle Ramm, director of trans- portation for Burnet Consolidated Independent School District northwest of Austin, Texas, reported that the district idling policy hasn’t even been instituted for a year and she’s already seen vast


On average, how long do your buses idle?


Who


instituted and enforces the anti-idling policies?


Have


operational costs


increased or decreased as a result of anti-idling policies?


improvements to her fleet. “We have seen a decrease in fuel, A/C repairs and other repairs,”


she said.


A majority of the replies stated that fuel consumption has been cut due to the reduced idling times, yet only a small percentage of directors and supervisors said they use GPS or telematics to track idling or fuel consumption. Mark Engen, transportation director for West Aurora SD 129 in Illinois, said his district has utilized technology to monitor idling. “Making certain drivers are aware of their time while the bus is idling. We have it programed to shut down after 10 minutes,” he said. ●


Do you use


GPS/telematics to track your idling/fuel


consumption?


1-5 minutes — 40% 5-10 minutes — 29% 10-15 minutes — 18% 15+ minutes — 4% No idling — 2% Other — 8%


District — 74% City — 1.5% State — 14% Other — 9.5%


Increase — 15% Decrease — 85%


Yes — 27.5% No — 72.5%


18 School Transportation News • JULY 2016


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100