This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
TRAINING


Training Essential. Valuable. Expensive.


For a one-man band or cast of thousands, it’s a fact of business life. I


t’s always difficult to get the balance in training right. Some training is heavier on theory, while others prefer more practical learning; some is based on the acquisition of specific knowledge, while other programmes focus on


acquiring skills in practice. Phil Bowden, at management and training consultants Bowden TMS, believes the estate agency sector is particularly split when it comes to training. “For small independents, it’s about productivity – training is about adding value to the business. But the corporates want to see agents get some letters after their names, they see qualifications as particularly valuable.” He believes that’s one way corporates try to even the balance and compete against the local strength of smaller agencies. Of course there’s currently no


legal or regulatory requirement for agents to be qualified. The Office of Fair Trading last year decided that there were no grounds for


compulsory regulation of agents. That flies in the face of an increasingly emphatic body of industry opinion which advocates a basic level of training as a compulsory requirement. Dorian Gonsalves, MD at Belvoir,


Standards in estate agency are gradually rising with an increasing number of firms recognising the importance of training.


thinks lettings agents should be regulated and that should require a training commitment and NAEA chief executive Peter Bolton King says training is a real issue – quite apart from other regulatory issues such as registration and protection of client monies. “We are concerned that anybody can just start up with no training, we are one of very few countries where that is the case.” In the USA and France, being a


real estate agent requires degree level qualifications. “We believe that if someone is giving advice on someone’s biggest asset, that person should be qualified, not necessarily at degree level, but certainly qualified to a minimum competency standard.”


Raising standaRds NFoPP’s associations such as NAEA and ARLA require members to take the Technical Award, an NVQ Level 3 qualification, roughly equivalent to A-level (though some exempting qualifications are accepted, such as relevant degrees). The Technical Award covers relevant subjects such as law, building construction, property appraisal, and good business practice. Peter Bolton King says the Technical Award has become the basic entry qualification for the industry, despite the lack of regulatory compulsion; “A lot of firms we deal with insist that staff their staff take the Technical Award.” (Lettings agent Edmund Cude also gives staff a £500 bonus when they pass the ARLA exam.) On the sales side, Peter believes


standards are gradually rising. He points at the Property Ombudsman’s 2010 report, in which ombudsman Christopher Hamer stated that the fall in the average compensation


Compliance training is vital, you need to do it for your own defence.’


40 SEPTEMBER 2011 PROPERTYdrum


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69