commercial property 47


Makro lightens load after K2 fall


In a summer where Jimmy Carr was morally rebuked for using the ‘K2’ tax avoidance system to avoid £3.3 million in tax a year, the High Court has just made a landmark ruling that could make it easier for property owners to avoid paying empty business rates, writes Roger Reid of Haslams


Businesses have historically been afforded relief through the tax system when their commercial property stood empty. Business rates were waived for three months and charged at 50% thereafter to give businesses time to make a decision on what to do with a property and provide relief while sales went through or capital was raised to refurbish. Industrial properties were fully exempt.


green shoots of recovery ever work out which way is up.


Interestingly, the Conservative and Liberal Democrats were on the property industry’s side in vehemently opposing the empty rates bill when it came in to force. They were highly critical of the tax which Vince Cable branded as “ludicrous, completely counterproductive and economically very damaging”. David Cameron branded Labour as the “enemy of enterprise” over the decision.


But controversially in the budget of 2007 the then chancellor Gordon Brown announced that the Government was scrapping this relief as part of the Rating (Empty Properties) Act 2007. Non- industrial property would be exempt from business rates for three months and industrial properties six months. After that time business owners reverted to paying full rates. The intention of this controversial policy was to try and reduce the amount of time a commercial property lay vacant by incentivising landlords to reduce rents.


In reality


the measure has led to a wide spread reduction in supply due to demolition of existing stock by landlords and an understandable reluctance for developers to speculatively develop new stock. So contrary to the original stated objective of the Government, the reduction in supply has actually led to higher rents in some areas. With improving market conditions, particularly in the industrial sector this is a situation that is likely to be compounded.


The consequences of this ‘stealth tax’ have been far reaching as many predict that recovery from the downturn will be slower as SMEs will have a smaller choice of affordable accommodation to choose from. That is if the much anticipated


THE BUSINESS MAGAZINE – THAMES VALLEY – OCTOBER 2012


On this evidence one could be forgiven for believing that when the coalition Government came in to power that things were looking up for landlords and developers and that the tax would be scrapped. But nearly two and a half years in to the new regime and despite high-profile campaigns by the British Property Federation, Estates Gazette and Property Week – to name but a few – they have persevered with the tax. What’s more, they have taken an even more aggressive stance by removing small business rates relief on properties with a rateable value of £18,000 and under. This was designed to help small business owners to survive the recession. To remove the relief will have a detrimental effect on employment levels and impact economic recovery whilst only netting the Treasury a relatively modest £300 million per annum extra.


Whilst demolition has been widespread, a less extreme way in which landlords and business owners have tried to avoid the tax is to test the courts' definition of ‘empty’.


A landmark case this summer has changed the landscape for the property industry. The case involved cash-and- carry firm Makro’s use of just 0.2% of the floor space of a 140,000 sq ft warehouse in Coventry to store documents. Originally the magistrates court found that the degree of occupation of the building by Makro was ‘de minimis’ and did not amount to lawful occupation, but Makro successfully appealed the decision in the High Court. They ruled that the storage of sixteen pallets of


documents was enough to trigger a six month “marketing relief” period once the pallets were removed.


This ruling is perhaps a victory for common sense and has set an interesting precedent for surveyors, property managers and local authorities. I expect this will open the floodgates for more ratepayers to partially occupy their premises to enable them to qualify for additional rate-free periods.


The empty business rate tax was thought out when the property market was performing relatively strongly. However since its inception the market has performed poorly and it is now acting as a major barrier to a recovery. The higher vacancy has boosted treasury coffers but the property industry is convinced that this is small beer compared to the economic damage it is causing. As the vast majority of commercial property is owned either directly or indirectly by pension funds the Government’s perseverance with this tax is not good news for us, the public, who will ultimately pay the majority of empty business rates.


If you need any property advice give Haslams a call.


Details: Roger Reid 0118-9211549 rogerreid@haslams.co.uk www.haslams.co.uk


www.businessmag.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60