Footnotes i
ii
iii iv
v vi
Peter Lyman and Hal Varian, How Much Information? (2003)
http://www.sims.berkeely. edu/how-much-info-2003 (reviewed on April 15, 2010). Ibid.
See Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. Bunnell, 245 F.R.D. 443, 447(
C.D.Cal. 2007).
Sedona Principles: Best Practices, Recommendations & Principles for Addressing Electronic Document Production, Second Edition (Sedona Conference Working Group Series, 2007) (Sedona Principles). See
www.thesedonaconference.org. See Ford Motor Co. v. Edgewood Props., Inc., 257 F.R.D. 418, 424 (D.N.J. 2009). In Green v. MClendon, 262 F.R.D. 284 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), the court held that the obliga-
tion to preserve potentially relevant evidence runs first to counsel, who then has a duty to advice the client of the type of information to be preserved and of the need to prevent its destruction.
vii viii ix x xi xii See John B. v. Goetz, 531 F.3d 448, 459 (6th Cir. 2008).
See FRCP 16(b)(3)(B)(iii); Treppel v. Biovail Corp., 233 F.R.D. 363, 368 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (re- viewing standards for issuance of preservation orders, and applying a three-prong balancing test).
For example: 17 C.F.R. §240.17a-4(f) (by certain exchange members, brokers, and deal ers); 29 C.F.R. §1602.14 (by employers).
Martin v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co., 2006 WL 148991 (M.D.Fla. Jan. 19, 2006) (Magistrate judge rejected attorney’s excuse of “computer illiteracy” as “frankly ludi- crous.”).
248 F.R.D. 372, 377 (
D.Conn. 2007).
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, 220 F.R.D. 212, 216-18 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (Zubulake IV); see Covad Comms. v. Revonet, Inc., 258 F.R.D. 5, 14-15 (D.D.C. 2009) (after defendant as on notice of litigation, an e-mail server crashed and yet defendant did not try to recover lost e-mails; court ordered defendant to pay for imaging and a search of all of defendant’s servers).
xiii xiv xv
xvi xvii
See Doe, 248 F.RD. at 378 & fn. 9. See Zubulake IV at 218.
See Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (Zubulake V). Zubulake V at 431.
Richard Chernick, E-Discovery Threatens to Litigize Arbitration, Law Technology News, (Apr. 16, 2010). See
www.law.com. (Reviewed on 4/19/2010).
If a party does not ask for metadata or otherwise specify the form of production in its first request for production, it may be ordered to bear the costs of re-producing Word and PowerPoint files a second time if metadata is desired. See Aguilar v. Immi- gration and Customs Enforcement Division of the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, 225 F.R.D. 350 (S.D.N.Y. 2008).
xix
See FRCP 37(e). Other sanctions include issue and evidentiary preclusion orders, con tempt proceedings, attorney discipline, and criminal penalties. They are beyond the scope of this article.
55
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68