This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
TABLETING 77


Continuous processing will require a change in mindset for controls and automation, explains Dr Hubertus Rehbaum


TheHOT TOPIC C


ontinuous processing for secondary manufacturing in pharma remains one of


Continuous processing has great potential for more efficient and cost-effective manufacturing of tablets


the hottest topics currently being discussed. Academia, industry and governmental institutions have embraced this development, working towards solutions from both the technological and regulatory perspective. Although from an economics point of view, continuous processing has great potential for more efficient and cost-effective manufacturing of tablets, the authorities and specifically the FDA pursue improved safety and product quality. With the pharmaceutical industry being extremely conservative, this paradigm change from batch to continuous requires a re-thinking for all the stakeholders that are part of the manufacturing process.


in pharma manufacturing


Despite some pharmaceutical companies taking the


engineering and implementation into their own hands, it is the machine suppliers that are challenged to translate concepts and regulatory requirements into industrially viable solutions, setting new standards for future production of solid dosage forms. In this respect, one of the major tasks on the pathway towards fully continuous production lines is the significantly increased complexity of the automation system, with the necessary control logic embedded. For reference, key words such as model predictive control, traceability and supervisory control systems are often used in this context. Until now, the process machines for batch manufacturing rely on local PLCs and PID control


loops, both very familiar to the pharmaceutical industry. However, the complexity of full continuous production systems exceeds the capabilities of these well-established technologies, calling for new methodologies. Instead of standalone


PLCs with HMIs, different architectures with distributed control structures and more advanced software platforms take a leading role in controlling both the production process and moreover the final product quality.1


Examples of such


implementations can be found in various test installations around the globe, either in pharmaceutical companies or on the demonstration systems of machine suppliers. Ahead of all, academia has presented pioneering solutions, implementing complex control


www.scientistlive.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com