This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
WORKFORCE, TRAINING & LEADERSHIP


Developing collective leadership for healthcare


• The most important determinant of the development and maintenance of an organisation’s culture is current and future leadership. Every interaction by every leader at every level shapes the emerging culture of an organisation.


• Boards are responsible for ensuring their organisation develops a coherent, effective and forward-looking collective leadership strategy for their organisation and assuring themselves that it is implemented. This strategy comes from purposefully describing the leadership culture desired for that organisation.


• Collective leadership means everyone taking responsibility for the success of the organisation as a whole – not just for their own jobs or work area. This contrasts with traditional approaches to leadership, which have focused on developing individual capability while neglecting the need for developing collective capability or embedding the development of leaders within the context of the organisation they are working in.


• Collective leadership cultures are characterised by all staff focusing on continual learning and, through this, on the improvement of patient care. It requires high levels of dialogue, debate and discussion to achieve shared understanding about quality problems and solutions.


• Leaders need to ensure that all staff adopt leadership roles in their work and take individual and collective responsibility for delivering safe, effective, high-quality and compassionate care for patients and service users. Achieving this requires careful planning, persistent commitment and a constant focus on nurturing leadership and culture.


Source: The King’s Fund – Developing collective leadership for health care; West et al 2014) completely barking mad,” said Lees.


“I don’t think any of this is complicated, I just think it is a question of understanding the people and working hard to get the best out of them, not saying ‘they are a difficult bunch, therefore, let’s not even try’.”


Changing the climate, not the culture


But rather than changing the ‘culture’ across the NHS, Lees said that he is in agreement with the health commentator Roy Lilley on this topic and instead believes we should change the ‘climate’.


“Roy Lilley argues that it is quite difficult to change a culture, but actually you can change the environment in which people work,” he said.


“So, for doctors, that is understanding the complexity of what they do, understanding how to get the best out of them, and supplying them with the support, training and development to get them there.”


Some people, when times are tight and budgets stretched, will want to disinvest in training to focus on urgent problems instead of long-


Another point raised in that report was the importance of stable leadership – with chief executives being at the trusts for a long time and avoiding constant churn at the top of organisations. This has, for too long, been an unfortunate fact of life in the NHS.


Looking ahead, he also noted that developing good relations between doctors and managers will be vital. “When we say ‘doctors are not engaged’, we need to ask the question: ‘what are they not engaged with?’”


This is because, he highlights, that a doctor will say: ‘I spend 60 hours a week in this organisation with patients and I am currently engaged with them’.


“What we are saying is that they are not engaged with the system, and also not particularly often engaged with managers,” said Lees, “and, again, one of the salient features of those trusts implementing good medical engagement was that they were engaged with the hospital managers and there was mutual respect.”


About Peter Lees


term ones. But the long-term knock-on effects of such short-termism can be drastic, he said. “I remember going to Kaiser Permanente in California about 15 years ago and one person, without prompting, said ‘you have got to remember that in this organisation when we run into trouble, we invest in education’.”


Lees criticised what he called the ‘31 March’ mentality of focusing only on balancing the books for now and never investing to save in the future.


He said: “Of course, if you carry on and continuously do that, then in 12-18 months’ time, the problem is still there and it is probably that bit more difficult to deal with.”


Lees believes that taking a long-term view can help address issues before they become problems. “The NHS is a people business,” he said. “Yes, there are a few pieces of kit! But we should be thinking about how we invest in the people and how we get the people to think they are involved and engaged.”


He added that all the trusts cited in the recent King’s Fund report on medical engagement got their systems right by working hard. But it took time. “This is a slow burn issue,” says Lees.


As well as his work with the FMLM, Peter Lees serves on the clinical governing body of West Hampshire CCG, the general advisory council of the King’s Fund and the NHS Leadership Academy steering group.


Over 20 years, he combined a career in neurosurgery with senior roles in operational management and leadership development.


This included experience at local, regional and national levels and in global health. Most recently he was the medical director, director of workforce and education and director of leadership at NHS South Central Strategic Health Authority; medical director of the NHS Top Leaders Programme; and senior lecturer in neurosurgery at the University of Southampton.


He is a graduate of Man- chester and Southampton universities, a Fellow of the Royal College of Sur- geons of England and a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, London.


Peter Lees


TELL US WHAT YOU THINK opinion@nationalhealthexecutive.com


national health executive Sep/Oct 14 | 27


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104