Case Study Environment
to our competitive edge. All of the 13 new vehicles comply with the latest environmental and emissions standards, meeting Euro 5 regulations, giving an estimated 16-18% fuel saving. Being Euro 5 compliant is critical for consignments destined for London – we wanted to ensure we had the fleet to support and expand our distribution capacity to the capital. In addition to the brawn of our fleet, we have also invested in intelligence by means of Dynafleet, Volvo Trucks’ online Transport Information System. This results in the most efficient service for customers, a reduced environmental footprint as well as a major benefit to the bottom line. Any fuel efficiencies that a transport fleet operator can make will be magnified due to the massive cost of fuel – it requires only a 1mpg improvement on a vehicle, which will generally achieve about 8mpg, to produce a 10% saving on the fuel bill. This is exactly what Farrall’s has achieved since using Dynafleet. It has helped the company step up from a fleet average of 8.6 to 9.6mpg, which adds up to a very satisfying £100,000 a year saving on fuel. Given that our bottom line fuel bill amounts to over £1m a year - our biggest bill after wages – this represents a substantial saving. This means that Dynafleet not only pays for itself but it also helps to fund other key investments in our business, such as IT systems, and helps perpetuate improved efficiency through a driver performance bonus scheme.
DRIVER PERFORMANCE
Dynafleet gives the operational team a real-time view of fuel consumption, service intervals and driver times as well as current locations of the vehicles in the fleet. This means the transport manager has the clear and accurate information
Phill Brooks,
general manager of Farrall’s Transport
needed to make the right decisions. Much of the data derives from the drivers’ driving style. The system’s rich functionality includes metrics on activities that can put pressure on the engine - such as the amount of time the vehicle is: left ticking over (idling time); being driven in the ‘green band’ on the revs; coasting on the automatic gear box; using cruise control; or is in top gear. A report based on these metrics gives the individual driver either a green (meaning good) or a brown (could do better) mark for each metric, and prescribes an ‘overall percentage score’. Every Monday the results are processed and used to compose a league table on how the drivers are performing. Our highly experienced transport manager will give feedback using the table, which will also be used to base decisions on whether drivers may require further training. Drivers at the top of the league table are also called in to review their figures and the telematics are used for quarterly reviews for all drivers. Our drivers have access to the Dynafleet App to see their real-time performance against the set criteria. They can also access their own trends. Meanwhile, our management team gains an overview of the fleet through this app - via real-time league tables by driver and vehicle. This enables proactive feedback and coaching from our transport manager and driver trainer.
FUEL-EFFICIENT DRIVING
Overall, Dynafleet provides our company with an essential monitoring tool to measure our drivers’ performance and to ensure they are driving as efficiently and safely as possible. However, getting quality data from the system is one thing - reacting to it is another. To get drivers to deliver fuel savings, you have to understand the person and how to get the best out of them. Companies can often fail to realise the HR issues. The way
www.shdlogistics.com
drivers drive their vehicles makes a great deal of difference to fuel bills and, of course the environment. As we have seen from the figures, any incremental gains that can be achieved across an entire fleet of vehicles over the course of a year will add up to significant overall savings and environmental benefits. Bottom line mpg figures will fluctuate due to variances between vehicles – newer models will better the mpg of 10-year- old units. The load being hauled and the weather conditions are variables that cannot be controlled, but driver style – the biggest factor in fuel efficiency – certainly can. So it is vital to encourage the driver to drive the vehicle correctly. The case for fuel-efficient driving is compelling. Few aspects of our trade can create tangible, bottom-line effects as rapidly as a well-trained driver. Lowering fuel consumption lowers cost and lowers emissions. A focus on driving practices has indirect benefits, less vehicle damage, less injury and lower insurance premiums. The investment is modest and can be part of the mandatory Driver Certificate of Professional Competency (DCPC), a cost that has to be borne; combining the two makes a great deal of sense. Drivers yet to complete their mandatory 35 hours of periodic training needed for their DCPC would be well minded to take a fuel-efficiency-oriented module. A further step to make a significant
difference to fuel bills is kitting-out the fleet with appropriate energy-saving devices. Innovative measures include fitting Spraydown mud flaps, fitting lift axles on trailers to reduce rolling resistance and using aerodynamic aids such as diffusers on the front and back of trailers. Wind deflectors that diffuse the drag down the side of the trailer can also produce results. The rewards of all of these measures are considerable, both in terms of the financial savings to the company and the improvement in environmental performance of our business, and we believe that achieving this aim puts us ahead of the curve for medium- sized logistics companies. n
www.farralls.co.uk September 2014 61
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84