6 TVBEurope Opinion & Analysis The brave new world
Alla Salehian, CEO of The
International Media Associates (TIMA), explores the impact that technology is having on the media industry, particularly
newsgathering and distribution
WE ALL know the media industry has seen monumental changes to operations, editorial workfl ow, newsgathering and distribution over the last decade. The main driver of this change has been the emergence of new technologies impacting content production and the rise of social media impacting publishing and content distribution. The barriers to entry for producing news content, for example, are no longer there. Individuals can now become journalists, photographers and videographers without the need for expensive equipment or professional operators. Similarly, the barriers for content distribution have also been removed with the rise of online video distribution platforms, such as YouTube, and social media networks such as Facebook, removing the need for large network broadcasters to access viewers. So, in this brave new landscape, what impact does technology have on the media industry as a whole and on newsgathering and distribution in particular?
There are two main issues to address here. The fi rst is how technology has changed
traditional methods of newsgathering, content creation and distribution. The second is the impact that these changes have had on the broadcast industry and the shift in the balance of power.
There is no longer any doubt that newsgathering technologies, in the form of smartphones, tablets, digital SLR cameras, and cellular bonded backpack systems — to name but a few — have increased the number of content producers and newsgatherers. In some cases, broadcasters have also come to depend on these ‘citizen journalists’ to generate content from parts of the world where they do not want to, or cannot, send professional journalists, raising obvious ethical and professional questions. The major impact on broadcasters has been on traditional linear workfl ows connecting editors, producers and journalists. New technology means that the time it now takes to commission a news story, fi lm the event, and edit and transmit the fi nished product is very short and journalists and newsrooms have had to adapt their workfl ows to accommodate
Alla Salehian, CEO, TIMA
track and access news content at short notice. For newspaper and online video sites, this has meant that computer algorithms have now replaced the role of journalists in sifting through content, organising and ranking stories and updating content and news stories on front pages and headlines. It is not too far fetched to imagine a scenario where computer algorithms will, one day, select the most important news content that will generate the largest audience, as it is being fi lmed and uploaded, potentially removing the need for news editors altogether.
the news agenda in the future, and not traditional news editors. Given the technical challenges facing broadcasters today, and the rise of the citizen journalist and publisher, it would be easy to conclude that the future is bleak for the broadcast industry. However, we must bear in mind that new technology is ultimately an enabler for content production, storage and consumption. The key is that relevant, well-produced content, which is adapted for distribution on broadcast, online, smartphone and tablet platforms and which can be stored and
“The challenge facing broadcasters in this new environment is how to navigate between the demands for reliable information, and the speed with which their audience can now access content”
this change in speed. Competing with citizen journalists and online delivery platforms for viewers’ attention has also added to the time pressure on traditional newsgathering practices. Content verifi cation is a major problem for broadcasters especially given the time pressure to publish a story. Technology has provided some help with this process; location verifi cation through GPS tracking, for example. Nevertheless, this function is still left to newsgathering professionals who look for clues in images and track the publisher of a story through social media trails. The sheer volume of
information and video content that is now being created and distributed has also generated the need for new storage technology to enable producers to sift through, organise, edit, tag,
The challenge facing broadcasters in this new environment is how to navigate between the demands for reliable information on the one hand, and the speed with which their audience can now access news stories and video content on the other. Technology has made it easier and cheaper to produce and access a mass of information, but it is debateable whether it has increased our knowledge and awareness of the world or helped us to make sense of events. That has traditionally been the role of professional journalists, and computer algorithms cannot replace this function. As more and more people access news content online and form into online groups with common interests and agendas, so they will come to be the ones to set
retrieved easily, will be vital for the survival of broadcasters. Let’s take an example from the music industry. The iPod has revolutionised the purchase, storage and retrieval of songs and iTunes has become one of the main music distribution platforms. But while it now costs only £199 to buy an iPod Classic which can hold up to 40,000 songs, it will cost about £39,600 to fi ll it with music content. The challenge — and
opportunity — for broadcasters is not from the citizen journalist but from adapting to new and emerging technologies and using them to create compelling content that appeals to the mass and the niche audience. That means adapting workfl ows and changing established mindsets, which I would argue is a much bigger challenge.
www.tvbeurope.com August 2014
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76