(part two)
Samantha Mann MCIPPDip MAAT, CIPP Senior policy & research officer and Advisory service manager, considers the impact of RTI on the year-end process timetable for the payroll industry and payroll bureaux, and draws attention to CIPP surveys
n the first part of this article (see page 22 of the December 2013/ January 2014 issue of PayrollProfessional) I opened discussion by reviewing some of the main changes to the year-end process for employers that have been brought about since the introduction of real time information (RTI). I refreshed memories as to one of the most significant promises
I 36 PayrollProfessional
made when news of RTI was being rolled out – i.e. a significant saving in our administrative burden by removing the need for the end of the tax year process. Only time and good research will reveal just how much of your valuable working time has been saved at this time of the year. So, let us for the moment, at least, consider just how the working timetable for
the payroll provider might now be changed as a result of the introduction of RTI and the removal of the employer annual return form P35 and forms P14.
Bringing forward the process We learned from service provider members who joined the RTI pilot in 2012/13 that, in recognition of the shortened deadline
technical
Out with the old,
in with the new
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56