This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
| INJECTABLE TREATMENTS | PEER-REVIEW A CROCANNULAE:


SIDE-EFFECT MI PROFILE OF


ABSTRACT The main aim of this article is to identify and quantify the side-effect profile of microcannulae with dermal filler treatments, specifically from a patient’s point of view. One of the biggest concerns patients have with dermal filler treatments is the degree and visibility of side-effects, and the extent they will have on impacting social events. Following on from the study reviewed in this article, the results will allow treating physicians to give a better understanding to their patients on the expected side-effect profile when using microcannulae.


T needles1,2,3


HE USE OF MICROCANNULAE FOR dermal filler treatments is a rapidly expanding treatment approach and has reached popularity among physicians over the last 2 years. The proposed benefits of


benefits of microcannulae, when compared with hypodermic needles, are


reduced downtime (trauma and bruising) and minimal insertion points.


microcannulae, when compared with hypodermic needles, are reduced downtime (trauma and bruising) and minimal insertion points. Furthermore, the progress of technology in the manufacturing of microcannulae has allowed physicians to treat every part of the face, neck, and hands. There are very few published


The proposed


studies that demonstrate the advantages, disadvantages, and differences


microcannulae and hypodermic . There have also been no studies, until now,


that specifically quantify the degree and profile of possible side-effects from a patient’s perspective with microcannulae, including erythema, bruising at insertion points, bruising of treated areas, pain and discomfort, swelling, tenderness at insertion point, tenderness of treated areas, and patient satisfaction following the dermal filler treatment with a microcannula2


. between


Alek Nikolic reviews the results of a study designed to identify the side-effect profile of microcannula dermal filler treatments from a patient’s point of view


ALEK NIKOLIC is an aesthetic physician with practices in Cape Town, South Africa, and London, UK. He is an appointed Allergan Local Country Mentor in Facial Aesthetics


email: dralek@mweb.co.za


PATIENT PERSPECTIVE


KEYWORDS microcannula, hypodermic needle, dermal filler, bruising, insertion point, downtime


prime-journal.com | October 2013





71


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100