This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
| DERMATOLOGY | PEER-REVIEW


Patrick Treacy presents the results of a study which compared two different fractional CO2


lasers to treat the signs of photoageing in 23 patients F


RACTIONALISED LASER SKIN RESURFACING HAS become an important component of facial rejuvenation surgery as patients continue to seek less invasive procedures with a low downtime and low risk1


. This


change in attitude has also been prompted by a realisation of both doctors and patients that the much hyped


Until this time, CO2


for the treatment of rhytides and photodamaged facial skin5–10 practitioners went further and stated that the ultrapulsed CO2


non-ablative methods are not comparable with ablative skin resurfacing and were often subject to extravagant claims with regard to efficacy2–4 laser resurfacing was considered the ‘gold standard’ . Many


. laser was


the most effective modality for repairing photodamaged skin as a result of years of exposure to harmful ultraviolet light11, 12


. This photoageing


effect is demonstrated clinically as a gradual deterioration of cutaneous structure and function. It manifests in the epidermis and upper papillary dermis by giving skin a roughened surface texture, as well as laxity, telangiectasia, wrinkles and varying degrees of pigmentation13, 14 laser skin resurfacing was largely


. Although, ultrapulsed CO2


considered the best option for treatment of this type of photoaged facial skin, it also had certain post-procedural problems15–17


. These included


prolonged postoperative recovery, pigmentary changes and a high incidence of adverse side-effects, including acne flares and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection18–20


made many patients reluctant to accept this method of treatment23, 24


. Fractional CO2 lasers


While non-sequential fractionalised technology is relatively new, its benefits of faster recovery time, more precise control of ablation depth, and reduced risk of post-procedural problems are already clear1


. Many patients also complained of


oedema, burning, and erythema that sometimes lasted for a number of months21, 22


. The delayed healing, implied risks and long downtime also


. These lasers also reduce the


consistently high levels of non-responders often seen with quite expensive non-ablative treatments that require many painful sessions25


. The obvious benefits of


these lasers have led to many new fractional resurfacing devices entering the market at the same time26


. CO2


The adoption of the newer fractionalised lasers by many physicians also


appears to have reduced the morbidity associated with this type of treatment1


.


Damage to the epithelium is less apparent because unlike conventional ablation, some of the stratum corneum remains intact during treatment and acts as a


DR PATRICK TREACY is Medical Director of Ailesbury Clinics Ltd and Ailesbury Hair Clinics Ltd; Chairman of the Irish Association of Cosmetic Doctors and Irish Regional Representative of the British Association of Cosmetic Doctors; European Medical Advisor to Network Lipolysis and the UK’s largest cosmetic website Consulting Rooms. He practices cosmetic medicine in his clinics in Dublin, Cork, London and the Middle East


email: ptreacy@gmail.com


KEYWORDS facial rejuvenation, photo ageing, fractional resurfacing, CO2


laser, rhytides, pigmentation prime-journal.com | October 2013 ❚ 47


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100