This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
PEER-REVIEW | INJECTABLE TREATMENTS |


Figure 9 (A) Multiple puncture points after native hyaluronic acid injection; (B) intradermal three-point injection with Restylane Vital Pen (Q-Med, Sweden); (C) shining trough of the needle during the intradermal injection


Conclusions


Rejuvenation of the ageing hands is experiencing a growing popularity owing to the recognition that the hands are the ‘new’ face. One of the most popular methods is volumisation with filling materials, which addresses the volume and contour loss, ‘bony’ appearance, prominence of the veins and tendons, and the loss of skin elasticity and thickness. Yet, there are only a few controlled studies regarding the anatomy and the use of different filling materials in the ageing hands. Fortunately, as our interest in rejuvenation of the hands is increasing, so too does our knowledge. As the primary concern should always be the correct


The author’s preferred


technique for hand volumisation is the single proximal insertion point (SPIP) technique with a 25 G or 23 G 2-inch (50 mm) blunt cannula.


Key points


■ After the face, the hands are the most conspicuous part of the human body


■ The optimal and safest layer in which to deposit the filling material is the underface of the dermis


■ A blunt cannula is the appropriate tool to ensure staying in the correct injection layer, thereby minimising the risk of damage to nerves and blood vessels


■ Every physician should have an exact knowledge of anatomy, product characteristics and injection techniques before starting the treatment


44 ❚


functioning of the hands, followed by their aesthetic appearance, it is essential to avoid any kind of complications owing to cosmetic treatments that may interfere with their function. Therefore, it is essential that a practitioner should have an exact knowledge on the anatomy, characteristics of the range of products, advantages, disadvantages, and risks of different injection techniques, as well as the correct treatment in case of complications. The author’s preferred technique for hand volumisation


is the single proximal insertion point (SPIP) technique with a 25 G or 23 G 2-inch (50 mm) blunt cannula (Figure 5). From the single insertion located at the most proximal atrophic point at the dorsum of the hand, all atrophic areas can be


References


1. Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz MG, Kloss D, Gruenert JG. Defining the basic aesthetics of the hand. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29: 546–51


2. Jakubietz RG, Kloss DF, Gruenert JG, Jakubietz MG. The ageing hand. A study to evaluate the chronological ageing process of the hand. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61: 681–86


3. Bains RD, Thorpe H, Southern S. Hand aging: patients’ opinions. Plastic Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 2212–18


4. Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Hardas B et al. A validated hand grading scale. Dermatol Surg. 2008; 34(Suppl 2): S179–S83


5. Man J, Rao J, Goldman M. A double-blind, comparative study of nonanimal-stabilized hyaluronic acid versus human collagen for tissue


augmentation of the dorsal hands. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34(8): 1026–31


6. Sadick NS. A 52-week study of safety and efficacy of calcium hydroxylapatite for rejuvenation of the aging hand. J Drugs Dermatol 2011; 10(1): 47–51


7. Brandt FS, Cazzaniga A, Strangman N, Coleman J, Axford-Gatley R. Long-term effectiveness and safety of small-gel-particle hyaluronic acid for hand rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38(7): 1128–35


8. Gargasz SS, Carbone MC. Hand rejuvenation using Radiesse. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125(6): 259e–260e


9. Busso M, Applebaum D. Hand augmentation with Radiesse® (Calcium hydroxylapatite).


Dermatol Therapy 2007; 20(6): 385–7


10. Bidic SM, Hatef DA, Rohrich RJ. Dorsal hand anatomy relevant to volumetric rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 163–68


11. Shamban AT. Combination hand rejuvenation procedures. Aesthet Surg J 2009; 29(5): 409–13


12. Bank DE. A novel approach to treatment of the aging hand with Radiesse®. J Drugs Dermatol 2009; 8(12): 1122–6


13. Kühne U, Imhof M. Treatment of the ageing hand with dermal fillers. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2012; 5(3): 163–9


14. Dallara JM. A prospective, noninterventional study of the treatment of the aging hand with Juvederm® Ultra 3 and Juvederm® Hydrate. Aesth Plast Surg 2012; 36(4): 949–54


reached. This technique is less traumatic and less painful for the patient than other techniques that use multiple insertion points. Also, the risk of injuring the vessel and causing haematoma is lower when performing the single insertion point than with multiple insertion points. Furthermore, from this point it is easier to introduce the blunt cannula than from a distal position, as well as to place the material in the correct layer (immediately below the dermis). As the filler is already distributed during the injection, no massage after the treatment is necessary. The author’s


preferred material for hand augmentation is CaHA (Radiesse®; Merz Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany) because of its good volumising properties as well as induction of a new collagen deposition. The author recommends diluting a 1.5 ml syringe with 0.5 ml 2% lidocaine with adrenaline, and then injecting half of the material in each hand. In cases with more severe atrophy a second injection session after 6–8 weeks is recommended.


Declaration of interest None Figure images 2a–b, 3, 4b–d, 5–9 © Dr Tatjana Pavicic


October 2013 | prime-journal.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100