This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
PEER-REVIEW | HAND REJUVENATION | Technology has evolved from painful procedures that


required significant downtime to non-painful, non-invasive


procedures with no downtime and effective results.


stimulate fibroblasts, which leads to collagenesis. This


combination increases blood perfusion to the treatment area, supporting fibroblast activity and the rejuvenation process as a whole69


. The Isōlaz system (Solta Medical,


Inc., Hayward, CA, USA) allows for manipulation of the optical characteristics of the skin by incorporating a vacuum to pull the dermis closer to the surface of the skin then exposing it to light, which improves the efficiency of energy transmission70–72


.


Key points . This allows the


physician to treat the target area with lower wavelength light and lower fluences, increasing efficacy and decreasing patient discomfort73


The Polaris WRA™ (Syneron Medical Inc.) device


uses both bipolar RF energy and diode laser at 900 nm to simultaneously treat rhytides and skin laxity. The RF energy penetrates the skin, heating deeper tissues and inducing neocollagenesis, while the diode laser targets pigmentation and vascular issues that are more superficial74


. Yu et al compared the Polaris device to


ReFirme ST™ (Syneron Medical, Inc.), which uses bipolar RF energy to supplement infrared laser at 700–2000 nm and induce non-painful skin tightening by remodelling dermal tissue without damaging the epidermis75, 76


. Although there were no statistically


significant differences between the two devices for general skin improvements, histopathological changes showed a higher collagen fibre density after treatment with the Polaris WRA. Furthermore, there were statistically significant improvements in the cheek, jowl and nasolabial folds with Polaris WRA and in the nasolabial folds treated with ReFirme ST75


32 ❚ . October 2013 | prime-journal.com


■ Rejuvenation of the hands is an important consideration since the appearance of the hands tends to show more significant photoageing than a person’s face


■ Technology has evolved from painful procedures that required significant downtime to non-painful, non-invasive procedures with no downtime and effective results


■ Intense pulsed light (IPL) devices target both dyspigmentation and vascularity, resulting in an overall improvement of photodamage


■ Light emitting diodes (LED) have been shown to have anti- inflammatory properties and accelerate wound healing with no reported side effects


■ Radiofrequency techniques cause collagen shrinkage with skin tightening due to increased penetration depth


Conclusions The face and hands receive the most exposure to sunlight throughout a person’s lifetime, and therefore show the most photodamage in the form of dyspigmentation, texture changes, wrinkles and loss of volume. Although the majority of aesthetic dermatologic treatments target the face, rejuvenation of the hands to treat photoageing is also an important consideration. Technology has evolved from painful procedures that required significant downtime to non-painful, non- invasive procedures with no downtime and effective results. Specifically, light and RF-based technologies continue to be implemented and improved on to achieve the optimum degree of photorejuvenation for the aesthetic patient. These procedure can be combined with volume replacement using fillers or fat to yield optimal hand rejuvenation outcomes.


Declaration of interest Dr Nestor serves on the advisory


board as well as being a speaker, consultant, and investigator for Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, and he is a consultant and investigator for Ulthera and Erchonia Corporation. Additionally, Dr Nestor has been a consultant, investigator and has served on the advisory board for Galderma. Dr Newberger has no conflict of interest to declare.


Figures 1 © Solta Medical, Inc., 2 and 3 © Dr Mark S. Nestor Article references on page 34


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100