Technocover has successfully completed testing to LPS 1175 issue 7 of its full range of UltraSecure upstand covers and flush fit covers for security ratings (SR) 2, 3 and 4. The Welshpool (Powys) based LPCB security product specialist has positive test data for all variants of its upstand and flush- fitting high security access covers for SR 2, 3 and 4. This includes single, twin, triple and multiple leaf options, for clear openings up to 4900mm, in both upstand and flush- fit UltraSecure ranges. With testing complete, Technocover is underway with final design documentation prior to the revision of specifier data and LPCB Red Book entries. It concludes an 18 month programme that has seen the complete UltraSecure access cover range to SR 2, 3 or 4, plus new models in the pipeline – over 50 variants in all - undergo LPCB testing for full line certification to issue 7 of LPS 1175.
“Currently we have the broadest range of LPCB approved upstand and flush-fit covers, and we aim to maintain this lead with issue 7 certification across these models at security levels 2, 3 and 4,” said managing director, Michael Miles. “This comprehensive retesting also means that there will be no void areas in our LPCB certification within these ranges.” He added: “The programme has been a significant commitment of time, resources and investment, but further strengthens
Technocover aiming for LPCB issue 7 certification
our capability to meet customer requirements and maintain our lead in water security.” Loss Prevention Standard LPS 1175: Issue 7 is the current version of the key security testing standard
(‘Specification for testing and classifying the burglary resistance of building components, strong-points and security enclosures’) used for LPCB product certification.
New issues of the standard are periodically released when updates and upgrades are made to the attack tools, attack times and/or test methodology used in LPS1175 to rate the level of physical protection provided by compliant products. LPCB approves security products to eight current security ratings, from 1 to the highest 8.
Mr Miles warns: “There is still a misconception among some that a manufacturer’s LPS 1175 certification for a specific size extends to other size options and configurations in that range. This can lead to the inadvertent use of uncertified products leaving the specifier and asset owner with no redress if problems arise. “Issue 7 approval of every cover option in our SR 2, 3 and 4 UltraSecure cover ranges will give clients absolute assurance that they are installing a certified product.”
He points out that specifiers should always confirm that the cover type, size and security level sought are listed in the LPCB Red Book which also includes the LPS 1175 issue of testing.
In addition to upstand and flush-fitting
covers, Technocover’s UltraSecure range includes LPCB approved key entry or padlock doors, louvres, bar sets, cylinder clamps, modular mesh panels, enclosures and buildings for the full spectrum of critical national infrastructure protection. Richard Flint, physical security certification scheme manager at LPCB, commented: “Technocover has developed an impressive portfolio of products. LPS 1175 is a difficult standard to achieve with over 95% of products submitted to LPCB failing to achieve the mark. The fact Technocover has such an extensive scope of products approved to LPS 1175 is testament to their design and engineering excellence and robust quality systems.” Tel: 01938 555511
Email:
admin@technocover.co.uk www.technocover.co.uk
Ward Security warns FM Managers on squatter risk
Ward Security is warning facilities managers to be on their guard and take extra precautions to secure vacant sites as reports mount of increasing squatter activity in commercial premises. The warning comes one year on from a change in the law that saw squatting in residential property become a criminal offence, punishable by up to six months in prison or a fine of £5,000. In contrast, commercial landlords must bring about a civil proceeding against trespassers which can be costly and time consuming. David Ward, managing director of Ward
Security, commented: “Given some 15% of commercial property in the UK stands vacant and with nearly 50,000 empty shops already on UK high streets, a shift towards the occupation of these properties was inevitable when the law failed to extend to commercial premises.
“Empty shops, pubs and properties awaiting redevelopment are particularly being targeted and with the winter months fast approaching we’re expecting the problem to worsen. Squatters are far more
36 security & access control
than just a nuisance – these individuals can cause serious damage to premises. Landlords are liable for this damage to their insurers as well as for any injuries incurred by the trespassers.
“In addition, property owners have to inform their insurers once a property falls foul of squatters, which can send insurance premiums soaring. Clearly it’s imperative that facilities managers and property owners take extra steps to prevent squatters moving in and so prevent this costly problem.”
Last month (July), the Justice Secretary Chris Grayling acknowledged the growing issue of squatters targeting the commercial property sector and promised to evaluate the full scale of the problem. However, any review of the law that criminalises squatting in residential property, which was enacted on 1 September 2012 by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, would be a lengthy procedure. Ward said: “There are a number of security measures site owners and
managers can take to protect commercial sites. A large, high value development site may call for on-site security guards or a fully monitored CCTV system, while a smaller site could benefit from a Wireless Intruder Detection Systems (WIDS), which is
David Ward
activated by movement sensors and sends video footage to its operators following any intrusion.” Ward added: “It is also vital to check that all existing forms of security are in good working order. If there are any doubts about a site’s security, call in a security expert to review the arrangements as a matter of urgency.”
For more information about Ward Security visit
http://ward-security.co.uk
Building & Facilities Management – September 2013
Security & Access Control
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44