Feature Enclosures Ingress protection techniques


The IP rating is one of the most critical factors when considering which electrical enclosure or junction box should be used to protect electrical systems. As such, Chris Lloyd, general manager for Spelsberg UK, explains how different IP ratings can be reached and how to maximise your enclosure’s integrity


low IP ratings are more often supported with a ‘push-click’ mechanism which is quicker to use but allows for a small degree of movement once closed. Hinges and other accessories may also affect the enclosure’s IP levels - while they may offer improved access for the user they also generate more gaps through which foreign bodies or mois- ture could infiltrate.


Silicone gel I


P ratings relate to the degree of pro- tection that a housing offers against ingress from foreign bodies and moisture. The rating system utilises the letters IP (ingress protec- tion) followed by two digits - the first to indicate protection against foreign bodies and the second to indicate pro- tection from moisture. As the numbers get higher so too does the level of pro- tection - IP68 being the highest. Delivering such protection is the result of many years of research and development from manufacturers. Two enclosures which offer the same level of overall protection may achieve it in very different ways - which can impact on the purchase cost, installation time and longevity of the product. Understanding the different techniques is vital in choos- ing the correct enclosure.


Ingress


Debris or moisture can enter the enclo- sure through gaps between the body of the product and its lid. No matter how precisely an enclosure is manufactured, particles of dust and water droplets will be able to fit through the gaps which are left if a seal is not employed. This is why high quality enclosures will often fea- ture sealing arrangements to ensure absolute protection. To guarantee that its seals won’t fail, Spelsberg has invested in developing an injection moulding technique which means the seal is formed as a single construction which is an inte- grated part of the enclosure. Enclosures which are designed to offer higher IP ratings will typically require tooling to fix the lid in place. This plays an important part in making sure that the seals are securely pressed flush against the surface, and that small impacts won’t affect this. Medium and


24


Above: it is important to know how IP ratings are achieved and the ways in which they can be


compromised during installation


A popular technique which is used to deliver an IP rating of IP68, is to fill the enclosure with a silicone gel after the connections have been made, thus completely isolating the electrics from the external atmosphere.


Above: IP ratings relate to the degree of protection that a housing offers against ingress from foreign bodies and moisture


Below: Spelsberg offer a


customisation service which allows the


customer to specify the number, size and location of entry points


Using gel to protect the contents of an enclosure means that an IP68 rating is easier to achieve and doesn’t require such expensive tooling. This means that the units are often supplied cheaper. Because of the guaranteed internal pro- tection there is also little need for screw down lids. This can speed up the instal- lation process and ultimately improve the profitability of jobs which involve numerous installations. However, there is a down side to sil- icone gel as it is impossible to access the connections without breaking the gel apart once it has been set. This means that, in applications where reg- ular updates or routine maintenance may be required, they can prove time consuming and expensive as a new gel pack will be required each time.


Entries


A final consideration when specifying the enclosure is the number of entries that may be required and ways in which the entry option is presented. As stan- dard many enclosures are available with knock-out points around the walls of


the unit which can be removed using the correct tools. This method is prefer- able to pre-cut holes as it means that the enclosure is supplied with its IP rating intact. However, there is a fine balance between the knock-outs being extremely hard to remove and being too easy - either vastly increasing installation time or risking accidental removal once in the application.


Specifying the correct enclosure is only the first step in delivering a housing solution which meets the correct requirements. As soon as a cable enters the unit its IP rating is compromised, which means that specifying the correct entry sealing solution is equally impor- tant. For high IP ratings the traditional dome topped cable gland offers absolute security while ‘push-fit’ membranes offer a speedy solution for applications which are less exposed to the elements. Finally it is important to check that the installation process does not risk compromising the effectiveness of the enclosure’s designed-in protection. Often a customer will have specified a high rating enclosure with dome topped cable glands and after a few months found that there has been water or dust ingress. Below are some classic mistakes to avoid:


• Positioning the entry points on the top side of an enclosure located outside, where puddles of water are likely to col- lect around the seal and be drawn in by heat expansion and contraction. • Fixing caution notes and signs to the lid of an enclosure with screws that perforate the enclosure. • Not fitting breather valves in high humidity environments with a large temperature differential.


• Compromising the enclosure by fixing it to a wall or bulkhead through the back panel.


• Using enclosures with loose gas- kets that fall out of place as the lid is closed or tightened up.


Mistakes like this are easy to avoid and any good supplier should be able to offer advice. It’s always worth asking how an enclosure’s IP rating is achieved - most suppliers should be able to show you the different options available and help you in the specification process.


Spelsberg www.spelsberg.co.uk T: 01952 200 716


Enter 217 MAY 2013 Electrical Engineering


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44