RESEARCH NEWS
Calculated incoherence A wave of light can be thought of as a sequence of crests and troughs, just like those of an ocean wave. Laser light is coherent, meaning that the waves composing it are in phase. In other words, their troughs and crests are perfectly aligned. The antennas in the RLE researchers’ chips knock that coherent light slightly out of phase, producing interference patterns. In the 4,096-antenna chip, a 64-by-64 grid of antennas, the phase shifts are pre-calculated to produce rows of images of the MIT logo, as shown in the figure at the top of this story.
The antennas are not simply turned off and on in a pattern that traces the logo, as the pixels in a black-and-white monitor would be. All of the antennas emit light, and if you were close enough to them (and had infrared vision), you would see a regular array of pinpricks of light. Seen from more than a few millimetres away, however, the interference of the antennas’ phase-shifted beams produces a more intricate image.
In the other chip, which has an eight-by-eight grid of antennas, the phase shift produced by the antennas is tuneable, so the chip can steer light in arbitrary directions. In both chips, the design of the antenna is the same; in principle, the researchers could have built tuning elements into the antennas of the larger chip. But “there would be too many wires coming off the chip,” Watts says. “Four thousand wires is more than Jie (the lead author of the paper), wanted to solder up.”
Indeed, Watts explains, wiring limitations meant that even the smaller chip is tuneable only a row or column at a time. But that’s enough to produce some interesting interference patterns that demonstrate that the tuning elements are working. The large chip, too, largely constitutes a proof of principle, Watts says. “It’s kind of amazing that this actually worked,” he says. “It’s really nanometre precision of the phase, and you’re talking about a fairly large chip.”
Precision engineering In both chips, laser light is conducted across the chip by silicon ridges known as “waveguides.” Drawing light from the optical signal attenuates it, so antennas close to the laser have to draw less light than those farther away. If the calculation of either the attenuation of the signal or the variation in the antennas’ design
Because of the interference of the phase-shifted light beams emitted by the antennas, images of the MIT logo appear to hover above the surface of the chip
is incorrect, the light emitted by the antennas could vary too much to be useful.
Both chips represent the state of the art in their respective classes. No two-dimensional tuneable phased array has previously been built on a chip, and the largest previous non-tuneable (or “passive”) array had only 16 antennas. Nonetheless, “I think we can go to much, much larger arrays,” Watts says. “It’s now very believable that we could make a 3-D holographic display.”
“I think it’s one of the first clearly competitive applications where photonics wins,” says Michal Lipson, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at Cornell University and head of the Cornell Nanophotonics Group.
“Within the photonics community, Lipson says, most work is geared toward “the promise that if photonics is embedded in electronic systems, it’s going to really improve things. Here, (the MIT team) has developed a complete system. It’s not a small component: This system is ready to go. So it’s very convincing.”
Lipson adds that the tuning limitation of the MIT researchers’ prototype chips is no reason to doubt the practicality of the design. “It’s just physically hard to come up with a very high number of contacts that are external,” she says. “Now, if you were to integrate everything so that it’s all on silicon, there shouldn’t be any problem to integrate those contacts.” More details of this work are published in the paper, “ Large-scale nanophotonic phased array,” by Jie Sun et al in Nature, 493, 195–199, (10 January 2013). DOI: 10.1038/ nature11727.
© 2013 Angel Business Communications. Permission required.
Issue I 2013
www.siliconsemiconductor.net 15
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42