Technology
ComputersaysGO! T
Hornsey rolling stock inspector Keith Taffs (left) and fleet performance manager Terry Ridley use an iPad to trial the new diagnostic system on a Class 313 train
Engineers at First Capital Connect have developed a new computer tool that will speed the time it takes to deal with failed trains, leading to fewer cancellations and – if necessary – the quicker evacuation of passengers
he Train Assisted Faults and Failures System (TAFFS) is believed to be the UK’s first web-based diagnostic system
for failed trains that can be used by both train service controllers on PCs and engineers carrying iPads. The system guides the controller/
engineer in conversation with the driver of the stricken train through the most logical steps to fix the fault in the shortest space of time. If the problem can’t be rectified, it
will guide them to options for either evacuating passengers or attaching another train to push or pull it out. TAFFS advises what emergency couplers might be needed to move the train and identifies any compatibility issues with the differing types of trains that may be used, while all the time running a timer and advising those in charge of the next course of action.
The system was named after Hornsey rolling stock inspector Keith Taffs, who was commended for his role in its development, and the aim is to roll-out the product throughout FirstGroup - the UK’s largest transport operator
With First Capital Connect carrying more than 150,000 people a day, head of engineering production, Jason Long, said that within the first six months of its introduction there was a 46 per cent reduction in delay minutes due to train faults, some of which can be attributed to the new system. Long said: ‘This is all about clearing
the rail line as quickly as possible, either by getting the train back into service or moving it in the most efficient way
possible.That should mean fewer cancellations of services caught behind the failed train and less inconvenience for the passengers who may be stuck on board.’
FEBRUARY 2013 PAGE 61
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100