This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Measurement & Inspection


For example, low-cost machine tools are proliferating. “A number of [machine tool] companies are pioneering lower-cost machining centers,” explained Jean Zangao, product manager for Hexagon Metrology (North Kingstown, RI). “Today you can find, for example, VMCs in the $75,000 range. If you compare that to standard tool setting units that cost $3000–$5000, including installation, that is a significant fraction of the cost of the machine.” In response, the Hexa- gon brand m&h launched their new Tool Setter TS35.20. For roughly a third of the cost of higher end systems that feature RF or IR wireless communication, they are aimed squarely at the low-cost VMC market. “You would want a wireless system for machines with more than three-axis or more complicated than a VMC,” explained Zangao. According to the company, they fix the TS35.20 to the table in the machine, sending its signals by cable to the control unit. The company reports deflection force down to 2.2 N•m,


Tool Break Detector (TBD) that uses laser beam triangula- tion. The system projects a laser beam onto the tool surface that reflects onto a receiver. The company says that even in the presence of coolant, its algorithm for detecting break- age will “accurately analyze the reflected light signal created by a rotating tool.” The probe works with tools operating at 200–5000 rpm, with diameters as small as 0.2 mm. Tools may be positioned at a distance of between 0.3 m to 2.0 m from the TBD unit based on the installation. The unit requires a wire connection to the machine tool and is suitable only for center cutting or solid tools, according to Sharad Munda, Mida probes product manager for Marposs.


Machining Goes Small


The TT460 Probe for on-machine tool measurement transmits in either RF, IR or both (Heidenhain).


which the company says allows users to measure tools with a diameter as small as 0.1 mm to a system accuracy of 0.5 µm. Measuring is done at speeds of up to 3 m/min. To measure ever-smaller tools, m&h recently launched the Laser Tool Setter LTS35.65-23, specifically designed for machines with small footprints. It boasts an accuracy of 0.2 µm and measures lengths and radii on parts with a minimum diameter of 25 µm. In another nod to the low-cost end of the market, Marposs (Auburn Hills, MI) also recently introduced its Mida brand


56 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | January 2013


Machining smaller is another trend to which metrology providers need to adapt. Marposs responded to this trend by recently launching its new higher precision Mida ML75HP noncontact laser tool-setting system for on-machine tool checking. This is a variation on its existing Mida ML75P laser tool setter. This unit features a laser beam that checks tools as small as 10 µm in diameter. “To set this in context, our ML75Pico is good for measuring tools that are greater than 30 µm and the standard ML75P is good for tools greater than 50 µm in size,” said Munda. “We have a customer in San Francisco measuring tools to a repeatability of 0.2 µm that are 25 µm in diameter.” The ML75HP generates a laser


beam between an emitter and a receiver mounted inside the machine tool working area. When a tool mounted on the spindle interrupts the laser beam, the laser system outputs a signal to the machine CNC. Checks the system performs include tool length and radius measure; tool wear compensa- tion; tool breakage detection; insert/cutting edge integrity; insert/cutting edge profile; and thermal drift compensation. To avoid issues with lasers in machine tool environments, GF AgieCharmilles (Lincolnshire, IL) offers its Intelligent Tool


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132