This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Glenn Nausley President


Promess Incorporated www.promessinc.com


QualityScan M


ention “quality” and the almost certain response is “tighter dimensional tolerances.” But, with today’s machine tools able to mass produce parts with tolerances we couldn’t even measure just a few years ago, that is quickly becoming a dead-end street. It leads ultimately to a dimensionally perfect product that nobody can afford to buy. While things like engines and transmissions really do benefit from increased dimensional precision, and probably will continue to do so, there are a huge number of products that don’t. These products are fertile ground for a new definition of quality based on function rather than dimen- sion, and new technologies that implement this approach.


Phantom Dimensions Are Everywhere


An automotive control arm is a good example of a product that requires geometric precision to achieve proper function, yet is made of components that cannot be produced economically with very close tolerances. The control arm links the vehicle’s front, and sometimes rear, wheels to the chassis, a function that requires a high level of precision, but it is made up of heavy-duty stamping with three rubber-encased bushings pressed in place—clearly not a candidate for extreme dimensional precision. What automotive engineers typically do is define the geometry required in the assembly and leave the how-to achieve it part up to the supplier. Suppliers call this a “phantom” dimension, and it’s really quite common in a variety of industries.


A common approach to meeting the specification for a phantom dimen- sion is to build very precise tools and fixtures, and then constantly adjust them to deal with the constant and totally unpredictable variations in heavy-duty stampings and rubber parts. Other suppliers choose to simply “press and hope” and then “measure and sort” and accept the scrap and re-work as a cost of doing business. There is a third approach, however, based on an advanced electro-


mechanical assembly press (EMAP) technology. This approach uses force and position sensors to implement a “push-measure-push” process that achieves an overall dimensional tolerance of 0.06 mm for upper and lower control arms. In one installation, four Promess EMAPs are configured in opposing pairs and mounted horizontally in the bushing insertion station at the end


10 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | January 2013


How to Stop Overpaying for Quality


of the control arm assembly system. When the control arms reach this sta- tion, the ball joint and shock absorber stud have been installed and a snap ring pressed into place.


The ball joint is used to locate the control arm, which is then clamped for bushing insertion by the EMAPs. During this operation, the EMAPs repeat a ‘push-measure-push’ cycle based on their ability to monitor both ram position and pressing force with extreme precision. Both the absolute amount of force being exerted, and the rate at which that force changes over time are monitored.


While some products really do benefit from increased dimensional precision ... there are a huge number of products that don’t.


System software collects this data and uses it to produce an opera- tional signature of the process. By comparing the signature of the control arm being assembled, with the signature of a known good assembly, the control makes it possible to produce virtual clones of the good assembly with a high degree of reliability.


A New Way of Thinking About Quality


The system just described has significantly improved the functional quality of the control arm it assembles with no change in the dimensional specifications of the component parts. In fact, it’s quite possible that the tolerances on those component parts could be loosened to reduce manu- facturing costs with no impact on the finished product’s functional quality. Function is the consumer’s measure of quality, and function ought to be the manufacturer’s as well. Manufacturers spend enormous sums of money to produce ultra-precise parts that are assembled with technologies that have not changed significantly in a century.


Why not spend less on the components and assemble them with an intelligent system that can accommodate dimensional variations and still produce functional products? All that’s needed to make that happen is a willingness to step back and look at the possibilities inherent in today’s intelligent assembly technologies. ME


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132