58 nanotimes News in Brief
Liquid-Metal Batteries // Multi-Faceted Magnetic Phenomenon Confirmed in the Lab © Based on Material by HZDR, Germany, Image © Tom Weier/HZDR
At the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR, Germany), confirmation of a magnetic instability – the Tayler instability – was successfully achieved for the first time in collaboration with the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics in Potsdam (AIP). The findings should be able to facilitate construction of large liquid-metal batteries.
The basic principle behind a liquid-metal battery is quite simple: since liquid metals are conductive, they can serve directly as anodes and cathodes. When one pours two suitable metals into a container so that the heavy metal is below and the lighter metal above, and then separates the two metals with a layer of molten salt, the arrangement becomes a galvanic cell. The metals have a tendency to form an alloy, but the molten salt in the middle prevents them from direct mixing. Therefore, the atoms of one metal are forced to release electrons. The ions thus formed wander through the molten salt. Arriving at the site of the other metal, these ions accept electrons and alloy with the second metal. During the charging process, this process is reversed and the alloy is broken up into its original components. In order to avoid the Tayler instability within big batteries – meaning a short circuit – the researchers suggest an internal tube through which the electrical current can be guided in reverse direction. This allows the capacity of the batteries to be considerably increased.
Martin Seilmayer et al.: Evidence for transient Tayler instability in a liquid metal experiment, In: Physical Review Letters, Vol. 108(2012), Issue 24, Article 244501 [4 pages], DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.244501:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.244501
Frank Stefani et al.: How to circumvent the size limitation of liquid metal batteries due to the Tayler instability, In: Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 52(2011), Issues 8-9, August 2011, Pages 2982-2986, DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2011.03.003:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.03.003
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89