This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Laser-cut Craftsman Kits RIDGEWAY OFFICE BUILDING


The class M-53 boxcars weighed


1,600 pounds less than B&O’s class M- 26e boxcar then in service, so they could carry 1,600 pounds more revenue load. Also the cubic capacity was in- creased to 656 cubic feet. The lighter superstructure reduced


HO-Scale 19029 Ridgeway Office Building Footprint: 9-1/2" x 6-3/4" x 4-1/4"


www.gclaser.com - gcli@gclaser.com Made in


U.S.A.


the center of gravity of the car which reduced the sway of the car during travel, thereby providing additional protection for merchandise. The use of copper-bearing steel increased the life expectancy. The B&O proprietary de- sign was patented by John J. Tatum, the B&O car superintendent for a gen- eration. After the tests of the original design


Baltimore & Ohio class M-53 wagon-top boxcar: HO scale Mfd., by ExactRail, 1053 South 1675


West, Orem, Utah 84058; see the web- site www.ExactRail.com. A recent HO ready-to-run model of-


fered by ExactRail in its Platinum Se- ries is the Baltimore & Ohio class M- 53 “wagon-top” boxcar, one of the most distinctive freight cars to roll in North America. They started life as five ex- perimental boxcars of a new, uncon- ventional and innovative design built at B&O’s Mt. Clare shops in 1935 to test various corrosion-resistant metals. The design was originally referred to


from 1934 to 1936, a batch of 2,000 cars of class M-53 were built at four B&O car shops from June, 1937, and March, 1938. They were numbered B&O 380000 to 381999. The company shops and the numbers of cars built were Keyser, West Virginia (675); Dubois, Pennsylvania (575); Chilli- cothe, Ohio (385) and Washington, In- diana (365). The car’s dimensions were: 10′-0″ in-


side height, 40′-6″ inside length, 9′-2″ inside width and 30′-8⁷/₈″ truck cen- ters. They had 6′-0″ wide door open- ings and a capacity of 3,712 cubic feet and 50-tons. The M-53 boxcars were equipped


with a Duryea Cushioned Underframe to cushion the shock of coupling and


Pennsylvania RR 1935 Broadway Limited HO Scale


www.thecoachyard.com The Coach Yard


www.thecoachyard.com Committed to Excellence


80


as “covered-wagon-top,” which was lat- er shortened to “wagon-top.” A distinctive feature of the new patented body design was fabricated from individual steel pieces of side posts and roof carline in one continu- ous U-shaped piece that extended up one side, across the roof and down the other side. The pieces were joined by waterproof riveted lap joints. Each end consisted of a single flat steel sheet. The doors were also made of flat steel. The unconventional wagon-top design avoided the purchase of fabricated freight car component sides, roof, ends and doors from other companies.


travel slack movements. The under- frame consisted of a sliding centersill buffered by large springs. The draft gear travel of conventional under- frames was limited in order to keep slack under tolerable limits. The Duryea underframe was designed to keep slack under control but increase the energy absorption of the frame. The B&O was an early adopter and frequent user of the Duryea under- frame. The Duryea underframe caused the draft gear to protrude from the car ends. The M-53 boxcars were fitted with an AB brake system, Ajax power hand JULY 2012


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116