OPINION | ALPHA
//COMMENT: TRENDS There’s a game out there for everyone
by Ana Kronschnabl, Fluffy Logic
ABOUT THREE YEARS ago, I went to a talk by thatgamecompany’s Jenova Chen about his approach to games development. At the time he was talking specifically about the game Flower, released in 2009 It was a fascinating talk and chimed with a lot of the ideas I had also been having about the subject matter of games, such as; why are the concerns of games and their central characters so very similar and inevitably, therefore, so limited? Bringing an awareness of other industries and the diversity of the markets they cater for shines a light on quite how limited in scope and range of emotions computer games tend to encompass. So, why are the settings and scenarios in games so very similar? For example, why do most big, triple-A games involve large weaponry, large men/women/robots and a rather gritty post-apocalyptic setting? I am obviously exaggerating somewhat, but still, if we leave mobile development to one side for a moment, there is a definite overtone of gritty realism melded with over-the-top weaponry.
IN THE BEGINNING It strikes me that returning to the very beginning of computer games may shed some light on some of the reasons for this. As most of us involved in development
know, whilst narratives may be the icing on the cake, like hard silvery balls that capture the imagination of the player, it is in fact the game mechanic that underpins whether the game will work as a fun gaming experience or not. Many game designs start with the designer or publishers saying: ‘so, this is going to be a first-person shooter’, or ‘this title will be a side-scrolling puzzle game’. Whilst being useful in helping everyone
concerned understand what type of game they are making, it is also a rather reductive approach, limiting the possibilities. It is also highly unlikely to produce something genuinely new. The reasons are clear; if a genre is successful, there is a known audience for that type of game and – with budgets becoming increasingly Hollywood-sized – that is a comfort in an unpredictable world. Maybe this is the reason many people still do not want to engage with games. Again, the mobile market is different. Mobile titles are sitting in a genuinely innovative and interesting space at the moment. They are taking chances in terms of style: you would struggle to describe a typical mobile game as the form is currently so varied.
A CRITICAL CONCERN So, where does this leave the chance for innovative content, styles and even new, unforeseen genres within the traditional games arena? We have had a deluge of new devices, both for new consoles and more
DEVELOP-ONLINE.NET
established ones. From add-ons for the Wii to the AR experience of Kinect, many released to seriously damning criticism: see reviews for Steel Batallionon Kinect for further information. Whilst we now have a huge range of games that exploit the obvious aspects of the iteration, such as sword fighting, dancing and mech steering, we haven’t seen any truly innovative releases that use these devices within a totally new gaming context.
In a world that accommodates
Boyzone alongside Bowie, Placido Domingo and Blondie, there must be room for more difference in games.
The truth is that innovation is not easy.
Inventing new genres and interactions as well as delivering a guaranteed return is doubly hard. It means that the larger publishers and hardware developers need to be investing in completely different types of games. But the risk isn’t necessarily as great as they
would have you believe. The audience for games has plenty of room to grow. I know many people who never have – and maybe never will – play console games, because they really don’t see that they offer them anything.
THE SPICE OF LIFE To return to my initial point. Film, art, poetry, music; all deliver different experiences for a wide range of users, or people as I call them. It is an expensive undertaking, but the
rewards are great. There will be failures but there will also be very rewarding successes. So why do two of our main console manufacturers still develop games for a core audience of fourteen-to-thirty-five-year-old men? A forty year old man recently confessed to me that he never played console games – he generally played games designed for his 12-year-old niece on his mobile. He couldn’t see himself in camos, and loves beauty salons. So, in a world that accommodates Boyzone alongside Bowie, Placido Domingo and Blondie, there must be room for more difference in games. Let’s allow players to wander. What would happen if there were no pick-ups, hit points or even enemies? Jenova Chen’s Journey is a fine example of this. I am not saying that we throw the baby out with the bath water. But who knows what could be lurking in the bubbles? If Méliès had never dreamed of the moon we may never have had sci-fi. That would be dreadful.
Ana Kronschnabl is CEO and creative director at games and digital content studio Fluffy Logic, which has produced titles for a wealth of platforms across console, mobile and online. Fluffy Logic is currently at work on social game UrZoo.
www.fluffylogic.net
AUGUST 2012 | 17
If games need new genres, then perhaps developers would do well to take inspiration from filmmaker Georges Méliès, whose movie Trip to the Moon did much to create sci-fi
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100