This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
So, how were the cars serviced at a typical railroad icing platform/ice house?


When the cars were spotted at the platforms, the first step for the crews was to tamp down the ice remaining in the bunkers with long-handled wooden tampers. This broke down the ice arches or “bridges” which formed when ice melted from the bottom up. The number of inches of ice required to fill the bunkers was then noted. Optimally, the ice had been pre-staged on the plat- forms and was slid over ramps onto the roofs of the cars and into the bunkers. The ice cake was split on the car roof immediately prior to dumping into the bunker and broken into even smaller chunks as it was worked into the emp- ty spaces always present therein. If needed, salt was shoveled in at this point.34


Sample prototype ice houses Let’s study a couple of prototype ice houses in a little more detail. First,


let’s look at the Chicago &


North Western’s house at Clinton, Iowa. Clinton is a Mississippi River town located where the railroad cross- es the river on a high bridge. Clinton was the heaviest icing point on the C&NW system. All fruit, dairy and packer cars were inspected and iced there as necessary. As many as 140 cars per day were iced at Clinton dur- ing the warm-weather months. The construction of the house was similar to the plans discussed earlier in this article, the rooms being 25 feet wide by 50 feet deep. A new house built in early 1912 at Green Bay was very similar to the Clinton house, but had ice rooms 32 feet by 63 feet, this size be- lieved by the railroad to be a more eco- nomical arrangement for handling ice. The platforms for both houses were ten feet wide. The lower (chunk ice) platform was 14 feet above the top of the rail while the upper (crushed ice) platform was 22 feet above the rails. A third, much narrower platform near the middle of the structure accommo- dated the ice crushing machinery and the hoppers for the crushed ice and bulk salt bins. The crushed ice hopper, of course, emptied to the floor below for loading two-wheeled crushed ice carts. The middle platform was made as nearly watertight as possible to pre- vent ice melt from dripping on the crews below. One need only imagine the sensation of near-freezing water down the back of one’s neck on a July day on the Mississippi River to see the wisdom of this extra expense. In both Green Bay and Clinton, the railroad was somewhat constrained by the workable width the houses could


RAILROAD MODEL CRAFTSMAN


This Paul Larson photo taken from the machinery house level (above) shows the wooden “grapple blocks” on the continuous chain from the storage level to the machinery house level. The blocks engage the ice cake from behind and push it up the incline. The ice slide used to unload ice cars is shown on the lower platform. This Larson photo (below) shows the entire ice elevator apparatus in a wider view. Note all the staircases here.


be. This was a particular problem when ice-hoisting machinery was being considered.


Installing traditional


moveable galleries on the front of the house was not practical and on the rear it was not possible. Therefore, the rail- road exercised its only option–it built the elevating equipment at one (or both, in the case of Clinton) end of the house, that is, beside the house. Otherwise, both houses were fitted with multiple gig elevators powered by a 30-h.p. electric motor on a clutch- equipped drive shaft to raise or lower ice within the ice rooms to the appro- priate platform level for use. The ice source for Clinton was a nar-


row estuary in the river from which the harvest was hauled upwards 40 feet from the river level to a 600-foot load- ing platform for transporting the ice in boxcars to the icehouse. Ten to 12 cars could be spotted and six could be loaded simultaneously. The size of the ice field was necessar- ily limited, containing only about 20 harvestable acres. With a thickness of 12″ (the minimum thickness deemed worth cutting), the field yielded a har- vest of about 20,000 tons. Fortunately, a large part of the field could be re-har- vested during a normal winter and only rarely did ice have to be hauled in from other sites.


75


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100