This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.



ACTIVE LEARNERS: NeuroLeadership Summit atten- dees take breaks during sessions to talk about conference content as it is presented. "It’s so sim- ple and so incredibly effective just to pause, let people digest, and then go on," says Summit organizer David Rock.


the time to discuss the content or to ask questions. “It’s so simple and so incredibly effective just to pause, let people digest, and then go on,” Rock said. “And it’s amazing how many speakers we’ve had here who have never done this and they all just find it incredibly helpful.” Among those whom Rock has convinced is Philip Zim-


bardo, a psychology professor emeritus at Stanford University, who made a presentation at the 2011 NeuroLeadership Sum- mit. Arguably the world’s leading expert on the psychology of evil, Zimbardo has given hundreds of presentations, including at TED. At Rock’s request, Zimbardo “re-packaged” his pres- entation into 15-minute sessions, and wrote questions that were designed to prompt personal reflection by attendees. Tim Tobin, vice president of global learning and leadership devel- opment at Marriott International, acted as a moderator, pos- ing and fielding questions at the end of Zimbardo’s presentation, when there was an openQ&Aperiod. The structure engaged the audience, who knew that there


would be intermission breaks. As for Zimbardo, “It forced me to rethink the organization of my material and generate provocative thinking,” he said. “Of the thousand or so lec- tures I have given in the last 50 years, this was unique for me.” 2. Dialogues, not monologues. The second thing Rock


does differently is to have speakers interviewed on stage, so that content is presented in a conversation. At the 2011 Sum- mit, for example, Dan Siegel, a leading neuroscience researcher and a frequent keynote speaker, was interviewed by ChristineWilliams, the director of NASA’s Systems Engineer- ing Leadership Development Program. It takes a lot of work to design the conversation, “but it really pays off for every- one,” Rock said. “We’d all much rather listen to a conversa- tion than be talked at. Everyone is more comfortable, and more comfortable means better connections.” 3. Longer breaks. The third structural change Rock has


made is to schedule long breaks between sessions. The Summit agenda includes a 30-minute break in the morning, 90 minutes at lunch, and then another hour in the afternoon —“no excep- tions,” Rock said. The long breaks mean that the number of


www.pcma.org


sessions each day is limited to four. That requires fortitude, Rock said. “Everyone wants to fill that hour-long coffee break in the afternoon.” But Rock has found that giving attendees and presenters opportunities, time, and space with other par- ticipants during the longer breaks is more valuable to them than scheduling more sessions. “We make space for what we call connecting time,” Rock said. “I think those interactions are undervalued.” At the 2011 Summit, Zimbardo and other speakers used


the time during lunchto meet withsmaller groups, giving attendees the opportunity for one-on-one conversations with them. Between the breaks, the pauses during the sessions, and lunch and dinner, the Summit’s 200 attendees were able to spend up to four-and-a-half hours in unstructured social time in a day. That dramatically increased the quality of the time that they spent with one another. “You actually get to have pretty good discussions, not just ‘Hi, my name is Bob,’ but dis- cussions for several minutes with about one hundred other people,” Rock said. “That’s really rare.” Rock speaks frequently at other conferences, and finds it


“frustrating to have only 15-minute blocks, between sessions, in which to connect with participants,” he said. “Everyone has dozens of people they want to connect with. I think the human connection is at least as important as the ideas at these events.” In a digital world, we can easily gather ideas. “What we


can’t gather is human relationships,” Rock said. “I think the events that succeed will be ones that really value the net- working. And, it’s not so much networking, but the opportu- nity to meet and learn from your peers; to share and test your ideas.” 


—Barbara Palmer


FOR MORE INFORMATION: www.neuroleadership.org/summits/2011Summit.shtml


pcma convene January 2012


43


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110