This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
28 JOSÉ I. DUARTE ECONOMIST, MACAU BUSINESS SENIOR ANALYST - jid@macaubusiness.com


Hopeful of change A


nother year has passed with another outstanding display of economic growth by Macau. Unemployment was virtually zero and fears of in ation have abated somewhat. We may be tempted to conclude that all is well in our


SAR. Yet, one cannot avoid observing that most of the results achieved were driven by factors over which we have very little control. We caught, or were caught by, the crest of a wave that appears to have no end in sight. Continuous growth in gross gambling revenue seems to


make our economy insensitive to whatever happens abroad. But what fortune gives, fortune can take away. We must peer into the future and make timely decisions that allow us to better cope with challenges when times eventually change. Still, one cannot avoid the feeling that those things over


which we do have a degree of control are being allowed to drift. Decisions are either postponed or avoided, and objectives are poorly de ned or imprecisely framed. Drifting along subjects the fabric of society and the


economy to erosion, making it less resilient when the tide changes or the currents slow.


Policy vacuum Let us look at the economy. The one sector upon which almost everything else depends is doing very well, thank you. The  ow of visitors is steady. The  ow of money seems in nite. However, the taps to both are outside our jurisdiction and are themselves subject to forces, economic and political, upon which we have a weak in uence. That implies two main pillars should underpin economic


policies: a clear understanding about the expected and desirable development of the gaming sector, and a coherent approach to developing a legal and policy framework that favours economic diversi cation. There are mounting worries on both fronts. Signi cant decisions have been made on the future of the


gambling sector. Most notably the policy to limit the number of live gaming tables until next year to a maximum of 5,500 and to restrict their growth thereafter to 3 percent a year for the next decade. Aside from the abundance of adjectives used to describe these targets – adequate, sustainable, harmonious growth – no substantive explanation on how they were calculated was provided. They seem arbitrary. We could easily imagine other  gures


and rates of growth that could also be described as “adequate” or “sustainable”. The table cap also seems totally out of sync with reality.


It appears that we believe money alone will always fi ll in the gaps. Sooner or later, fortune will test that belief


JANUARY 2012


THE CITY’S ECONOMY IS INCREASINGLY DEPENDENT ON GAMBLING DUE TO SHORT-SIGHTED POLITICS AND A LAISSEZ-FAIRE APPROACH


What are the assumptions behind these targets? What


population, visitor and demand trends were taken into account to de ne them? What considerations in terms of their impact on the labour market, transportation, housing needs, infrastructure development were used? One can only guess. The same kind of uncertainty hangs over assigning land


in Cotai for new casino resorts. By the way, are they all viable within the existing limits on development? The same question could be applied to the criteria that will eventually be used to share the available gaming tables between casino operators. There is a sense of arbitrariness and vagueness in these


policies that is the contrary to good governance and fostering economic con dence.


Cushion erosion The excessive and growing dependence on the gambling sector, no matter how well it may serve the public  nances in the short term, can also become a curse if, for some unexpected or uncontrollable reason, the tide changes. The argument for diversi cation is often based solely on


social or ethical considerations. In many regards, a society less heavily dependent on gaming might be a desirable goal in itself. That is another discussion. From a longer-term economic perspective, a more


diversi ed economy is a worthy goal. That objective, continuously repeated by of cials, seems increasingly hard to achieve. A lack of policies to guide timely housing and urban development led to skyrocketing real estate prices. Labour policies that were incoherent and unstable led to imbalances in the labour market. Both labour shortages and rental costs have exacted a toll on family-owned  rms, and small- and medium-sized enterprises, and are serious obstacles for start-ups. Even if those sizeable barriers could be overcome, there


are too few people interested in engaging in these types of business. Anyone who knows a thing or two currently looks for a job in the gambling industry and expects a salary that is beyond most smaller companies. Smaller  rms impart a great deal of resilience to an


economy and to a society. As the autonomy and initiative of the government has progressively declined, it seems that the social structures that could provide a buffer during dif cult times are being weakened by the day. Throwing money around is unlikely to solve the problem. It is also questionable whether the co-development of


Hengqin Island with Guangdong will solve the problem. As much as it seems to make sense from the perspective of of cials in Zhuhai, in Macau, the project is trapped in vagueness by the “wait-and-see” approach favoured by our of cials. It appears that we believe money alone will always  ll in the


gaps. Sooner or later, fortune will test that belief. Not all is gloomy. A new year is setting in and with it comes


a renewal of hope. Happy New Year!


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116