This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
LEGAL & LITIGATION


Don’t let the lawyers win


But Harrison continued: “If you do get a claim in, the last thing you want to do is liti- gate. A lot of claimants lawyers out there, like to make this a long, drawn-out affair, because that builds their fees up. I used to do a lot of the claims handling in-house. My policy was, if someone’s been injured at work and it’s partially our fault, in most cases you can get some contribution from the claimant themselves. That’s because they’ve been correctly trained and we’ve got the evidence to prove they’d been on these training courses, we’ve got the evidence that they’d signed to say they’d had a safety briefi ng before they started work, but then something still happened.


that by Network Rail, just push it back to them and say I think we’re covered by your policy, we don’t have to buy extra.”


How much do rail industry professionals and employers need to worry about litigation?


Harrison explained: “In terms of employ- er’s liability, at the company I worked for, we were very proactive; we knew of every incident that happened, whether it was a minor injury, a near miss or whatever, so that we could take recognition of that fact. As far as I’m concerned, ‘near miss’ is a


misnomer: it should be ‘near hit’. If some- body is involved in something that is a near miss, well, it could have done serious in- jury, so you’ve got to take account of that.


“If someone’s injured at work because of a failing in what their employer has done, yes there will be a claim that follows, and it could lead to litigation. But in most in- stances, what I say to rail companies is to be aware of what is happening out there. If you get any near misses, do something about it, because it could be a hit next time. Make it safer.”


“So you get a contribution from them. You go to the other lawyer and you’ve got all this evidence, very early on in the process, so if you get the claim you can always go to him and say ‘yup, we admit liability, but we want some contribution – this is the settle- ment we’re offering, put that to your claim- ant and we’ll get rid of it’. And that was the way we used to like to operate, because the only people who win if you do it any other way is the lawyers. The legal system makes money out of it.”


Social networking


Another peculiarly modern risk – one cer- tainly not confi ned to the rail industry – is the potential fallout from the online world, both malicious and accidental.


Harrison said: “One of the digital risks that has come to the fore is your employ- ees’ use of Facebook and LinkedIn. If they put something on there, it can be a major reputational risk for you, so you’ve got to be careful. I know of instances where, cer- tainly in the rail industry, you can no longer get onto Facebook at work, using your work email account. If you use your work email account to get on it, it gives your posts some extra credibility: it fl ows through with a company name after it.


“That could certainly give the employer problems with reputation; for every com- pany, reputational risk is a big issue.


“It’s true that when you see something and you realise who they’re working for and what they’re saying, people then say ‘oh, well he knows what he’s talking about be- cause he works for this company’. But of course he could just have a grudge against somebody in the company and think ‘well I’ll put this and see what happens’, not re- alising the impact on him and the impact it could have on the company. Cont next page >


rail technology magazine Aug/Sep 11 | 53


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92