This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
INDUSTRY NEWS


Article on Shot Missed the Mark LETTERBOX


Te article published in the Janu-


ary issue entitled “Choosing Blast Media” (p. 34) took several positions I


believe were incomplete and in some cases inaccurate. Te article indicates choosing the


correct abrasive size and grade is the result of “trial and error,” which does not have to be the case. Rather, by evaluating such criteria as the work piece to be cleaned and specific equip- ment parameters, such as the number and position of wheels, motor rpm, line speed, and desired surface profile for surface preparation or cycle time, the correct size and grade can be cho- sen the first time.


In another statement, the article


implies you should charge a blast machine with 100% virgin S390 to run a trial. Tis should never be done. Rather, an operating mix consisting of the original S390 and the next two smaller sizes should be blended for such a trial. The article states that low carbon


shot is “interchangeable with other steel shot.” This is not the case. Low carbon shot, due to its micro- structure, is by nature softer than high carbon shot and therefore does not demonstrate as high a level of energy transfer. Lower energy transfer translates to slower and less thorough cleaning of the work piece. Typically, low carbon users must use one size larger than high carbon us- ers, which means less coverage and slower cleaning rates. Te article implies that size is the most important consideration when selecting a blast material. Tis overlooks the role hardness plays in energy transfer. Te SAE specifica- tion indicates a wide range of 40-51 Rockwell C for shot. Again, a harder shot of, say, 47 Rockwell C will transfer more energy than one at 44, thereby cleaning faster and result- ing in shorter cycle times. Also, grit comes in four hardness ranges that must be considered when making a grit recommendation.


Bob Schmidt


Vice President of Sales W Abrasives Bedford, Va.


16 | MODERN CASTING March 2011


Visit MODERN CASTING’s late-breaking metalcasting news at www.moderncasting.com/info


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84