This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
TRENDS<


everybody, sit down, look at your figures, at the data and the reac- tion. And then adapt and review. We are in an open conversation and we can measure it regularly, assess, evaluate, change, adapt, do whatever we have to do. It’s another kind of discipline, job and business we’re entering and everybody has to adapt themselves.”


Impact of recession Heureux sees the exact moment of the shift to digital as happen- ing late 2009 or early 2010, followed by a sudden acceleration. “I think that without the recession, it would probably have been delayed by another two to four years. Because TV was so domi- nant in the decision-making process of any advertising strategy, I think TV and others would probably have been able to protect themselves in the traditional way of doing advertising for up to another five years.”


Because of the enormity of the shift, he says that many of those involved would have favoured a more gradual change. “If we look at WPP, television groups like Bertelsmann and RTL, and then Clear Channel and JC Decaux, those are enormous, nearly empires that bit by bit are losing revenues due to this shift and change. I don’t think they will die because I’m very confident that they’ll be able to adapt themselves. But if they had to choose, they would do a slow adaptation process over four to 10 years rather than just overnight. “With this recession, we were all forced to take


hard decisions with advertising, because CEOs and boardrooms knew they had to review and change the way they were operating. That message came down to marketing, media and other departments and they had to adapt more rapidly than they would have if they’d decided themselves.” After two years of hard crisis, he believes the point has been reached where everybody has got the mes- sage and r eally


started to reorganise their internal group activities, organisation and expertise. “Look at WPP buying data mining companies. Who would have said Sir Martin Sorrell would have been interested in data companies 10 years ago? They’re buying new disciplines, new expertise. All traditional media has really engaged into much more digital content, activities and strategies, because they know that they have to change now more rapidly. “So 2010 is probably the right moment to say we have reached a certain point where we will shift from one story of advertising with a big ‘a’, to the next story.” And Heureux believes it is a hugely exciting moment for the sec- tor and for anyone involved in it. “I would encourage anybody from an older age or a young age to move into communications now,” he says. “We are now building the next big story that probably will last for 50 years or more. We are building the new blocks of this new industry with many new disciplines, expertise and functions that we will need to develop in companies.” One problem is around the area of training and education and


Heureux hopes that business schools and others will rapidly deliv- er programmes that cover the new story and the new practices and disciplines. “Otherwise we will have a gap of talent and experts and that’s something that we can feel already now, com- ing up bit by bit. “What is incredible in this industry is, it is still young, but it is still so much dedicated to R&D. The budgets that the Googles of this world are still investing in research and development of new services and new technologies is still so massive and impressive that I don’t think we have seen yet the last bit of innovation.”


Volume 4 Issue 4 2010 Marketing Age 31


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76