This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
NEWS


N


Time to Change reducing mental health stigma and discrimination ew evaluation


findings from the Institute of Psychiatry at


King’s College London reveal that England’s most ambitious anti-stigma programme, Time to Change, is having a positive effect on reducing discrimination towards people with mental health problems.


The overall level of discrimination reported by people who experience a mental health problem has dropped by four percent in the last 12 months. The levels of discrimination people face when searching for a job dropped by 9 percent and there is a six percent reduction in the number of people who report losing their job due to a mental health problem.


Time to Change has been actively campaigning for 18 months in order to tackle the stigma existing within people’s knowledge, attitudes and behaviour towards mental health. The programme has a target to achieve a five percent positive shift in attitudes


towards mental health problems and a five percent reduction in discrimination levels by 2012. The new findings back up recent research from the Department of Health which indicates that general attitudes towards people with a mental health problem are slowly beginning to improve in England.


Findings from Attitudes to Mental Illness 2010 show a 2.2 percent improvement in public attitudes from 2008 to 2010, with a significant 1.3% improvement in attitudes from 2009 to 2010, following the start of the Time to Change campaign. Further findings from the IoP reveal that the programme’s Time to Get Moving strand, which is a series of fun events where the general public get to meet people with mental health problems, is helping to challenge stereotypes and break down stigma.


A reported 35 percent of participants left with a more positive impression of people with a mental health problem after attending a Get Moving event and three-quarters of


people speaking about their experience of the event to others. Time to Change director Sue Baker said: “We have seen some positive improvements over the last year in the acceptance and understanding that people have towards mental health issues.


“Our challenge is to continue with our work in order to reduce the incidents of discrimination that are still so widely reported by people with mental health problems. Nearly nine out of ten people with mental health problems have been affected by stigma and discrimination. Just taking small actions to change the way we respond to the one in four of us who will experience a mental health problem would make a huge difference.”


Professor Graham Thornicroft, who heads the Time to Change evaluation team adds: “These findings are very encouraging and after only one year there is clear evidence of the positive achievements of Time to Change. This raises the intriguing possibility that we may be approaching a tipping point at which more and more


people feel able to speak about their own experience of mental ill health, and that this will then lead to a step change in public acceptance and social inclusion.”


Time to Change was launched in January 2009 with a national advertising campaign fronted by Stephen Fry, Ruby Wax and Alastair Campbell. This year, the campaign is fronted by Frank Bruno and Trisha Goddard and includes the cinema release of ‘Schizo: the Movie’, a spoof movie trailer, which shows that people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia can live full lives with the support of their friends and family.


Time to Change is England’s most ambitious programme to end the discrimination faced by people with mental health problems, and improve the nation’s wellbeing. The leading mental health charities Mind and Rethink are running the programme, funded with £16m from the Big Lottery Fund and £4m from Comic Relief, and evaluated by the Institute of Psychiatry at King’s College, London.


Better green spaces will create a fairer, healthier society says CABE A 8 nhe


new research study from the Commission for Architecture and the


Built Environment reveals that thousands of hectares of development land and open space on social housing estates are currently not being used because of poor quality. This represents a major opportunity to tackle inequality and improve health and wellbeing in inner cities.


Community green: using local


spaces to tackle inequality and improve health has found that people view provision of green space as a key service, alongside housing, education and policing. Yet less than one per cent of people living in social housing reported they use the green space on their estate.


Half of the 500 people interviewed said they would do more exercise if green spaces were improved and half expected they would have better mental health.


The biggest barriers to using green space were fear about personal safety, lack of facilities and poor quality. Only half of Bangladeshi people reported feeling safe using their local green space, compared with three quarters of white people interviewed.


CABE recommends there should be more scope for communities to take over temporarily vacant land and that RSLs and local authorities responsible for green spaces should work with voluntary groups to make it


easier for people to improve the green spaces on their doorsteps.


Sarah Gaventa, director of public space at CABE, said: “Improving green space benefits those that have most to gain, especially people living in flats. There are four million households living in social housing, and half of those residents are under 16. Even when funding is tight, green deserts can still be transformed into lovely, safe places where people want to be.”


Jul/Aug 10


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100