“Experience has shown that disputes may often be resolved in a way satisfactory to all parties, including parties who find themselves able to resolve claims against them which they consider not to be well founded.”


surroundings of a court room where justice will be served. Swapping all of that for sitting in a room with a mediator popping in and out all day, facili- tating a settlement can be seen as secondary justice or even, a sign of weakness. When I carry out the role of mediator, invariably


Tat risk was demonstrated in the recent decision of DSN v Blackpool Football Club Limited where, in awarding adverse costs against the defendant, the judge said: “Te reasons given for refusing to engage in mediation were inadequate. Tey were, simply, and repeatedly, that the defendant ‘continues to believe that it has a strong defence’. No defence, however strong, by itself justifies a failure to engage in any kind of alternative dispute resolution. “Experience has shown that disputes may often be resolved in a


way satisfactory to all parties, including parties who find themselves able to resolve claims against them which they consider not to be well founded. “Settlement allows solutions which are potentially limitless in


their ingenuity and flexibility, and they do not necessarily require any admission of liability, or even a payment of money. Even if they do involve payment of money, the amount may compare favourably (if the settlement is timely) with the irrecoverable costs, in money terms alone, of an action that has been successfully fought. “Te costs of an action will not always be limited to financial costs,


however. A trial is likely to require a significant expenditure of time, including management time, and may take a heavy toll on witnesses even for successful parties which a settlement could spare them. “As to admission of liability, a settlement can include admissions or


statements which fall short of accepting legal liability, which may still be of value to the party bringing a claim.” Te above echoes the views of the court and in BXB v Watch Tower


the judge stated the refusal to entertain ADR was unreasonable. Te first hurdle for any litigating party is the ability to put aside the emotions inherent with litigation. Parties feel they need their say in court, to exonerate themselves or they have a desire to cause as much discomfort to the other party. Tey are going before a judge in the


ALL THINGS BUSINESS


the first task is to get both parties to consider the reality of the alternative to mediation. As explained, court intervention can prove very costly, there can be delays while waiting for hearing dates (which often drag litigious matters out for a considerable time) and there is uncertainty. All too often medi- ation extracts the true feelings of both parties and, more often than not, the points of dispute can be resolved or, indeed, the parties have misunderstood their respective argument in the first place. Not untypical, in the last mediation I conducted


(by Zoom video conference), the parties started in a highly defensive mood; the claimant adamant their claim was good, while the defendant was equally confident the claim was spurious and they would secure adverse costs for wasting the court’s time. Neither party believed there was a reason to settle. The air was thick with intransigence. However, while going through the mediation pro- cess both parties began to accept their position was not so strong as they wanted to believe, and a settlement was eventually reached later that same afternoon. Not all mediations result in settlement but any


would-be litigant needs to understand the court’s view and expectations. To ignore this is to do so at your own peril.


Should you have an insolvency-related issue, or a corporate dispute then contact Gary Pettit at PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency on 01604 212150 (Northampton office) or 01234 834886 (Bedford office). Alternatively, send an email to garypettit@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk or access the website at www.pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk


25


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76