search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FOCUS


Strategies shared The first of two annual sector seminars from TagEvac gave delegates insight into elements of evacuation, writes William Roszczyk


was a ‘tragedy waiting to happen’ that ‘we must ensure never happens again’. There should be no such complacency going forward, and he asked what the industry can to do to effect positive change. Outlining the four evacuation options of stay


T


put, phased progressive horizontal, staged and full simultaneous or total evacuation – he said that any option should ‘refer to your overall fi re strategy and factors’ such as building occupancy or size. Reasons for implementing stay put include high incidence of false alarms, congestion, relative safety and lack of holistic systems, alongside designed compartmentation. The issue is that many involved in procurement


don’t know the correct fi re safety terminology, while limitations of and myths about building control lead to people thinking it is a fi re safety ‘fairy godmother’. This assumption imagines that building control takes full responsibility for fi re safety management. He then examined progressive horizontal


evacuation through care home and hospital evacuations, with patients ideally removed safely and to an adjacent, protected area of ‘relative safety’. However, when the model is put to the test


48 SEPTEMBER 2018 www.frmjournal.com


AGEVAC’S ALAN Oliver referenced the ‘huge impact’ Grenfell continues to have on the industry, stating that ‘we have failed’ – the fi re


it often ‘fails miserably’, with two hospital fi res in London seeing complete evacuations instead, and a lack of focus means that ‘something’s not right’. Thankfully nobody died in either fi re – one being at Royal Marsden Hospital – but the issues were signifi cant enough to force reassessments in thinking. Touching on different types of fi re risk assessments (FRAs), evacuation management and training, Mr Oliver spoke on case studies in which evacuations did not go to plan, including the fatal fires at St Michael’s Hospice in the UK and the US Station nightclub fi re. In such cases, people ‘don’t behave normally’,


so a ‘back to basics’ strategy is required, including revisiting an emergency plan, training and equipment. Fire and rescue services (FRSs) need to know if there is a fi re and where it is, as well as who is in the building.


Tall buildings


Horizonscan’s Russ Timpson stated that the Tall Building Safety Network had been ‘warning about ACM [aluminium composite material] for years’, pointing out that 432 new tall buildings are expected to be completed in London in the next three years. Most will have only one staircase, and consequently post Grenfell, he urged that a ‘new


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60