search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FOCUS


Competency matters


To adhere to fire regulations, a business’s appointed responsible person must be able to prove that the fi re system within particular premises is designed, installed, commissioned and maintained by a competent contractor in line with standards. Luckily, there are several steps that can be taken to ensure that this is done. Accurately specifying the best equipment


for the job at the outset is critical to ensuring fi re safety. However, the ever increasing range of new technologies coming to market can make it hard to choose the optimum solution. This is where third party certifi cation can be a huge help. EN 54 Part 13 approved products, for example, bring with them a high degree of reassurance. To gain EN 54-13 status, products are


rigorously tested to clearly prescribed levels. These tests prove beyond doubt that individual component parts, when combined into one system, will work together reliably in full fi re conditions. This near guarantee of optimal fi re system


performance and proper protection of lives and property offers a good deal of peace of mind to those specifying, installing and ultimately using the chosen fi re system. Of course, EN 54-13 is just one of many third


party certifi cations that help prove the quality and reliability of life safety products, and every country has its own standards and requirements. In the UK, adherence to BS 5839-1: 2017 is another fundamental way of ensuring the


effective design, installation and maintenance of fi re detection and alarm systems in non residential buildings. The guidelines within this comprehensive


standard also cover responsibilities and competencies for carrying out fire risk assessments. The fi re system’s ease of use is another important consideration. If a system is straightforward to install, use and maintain, it is far less likely to stretch the ‘competency boundaries’ of all those who come into contact with it. From specifi er and commissioning engineer to end user and maintenance technician, the easier the system is to work with, the less likely it is to pose problems and compromise fi re safety. Another effective way of minimising risk and gaining peace of mind, particularly if you are not an expert in fi re systems, is to opt for an established fi re equipment brand which invests in research and development; has current installations in a wide range of locations; and enjoys a reputation for performance and reliability. Useful starting points are to ask trusted colleagues for recommendations and request demonstrations and project references from manufacturers.


Competent installation


The performance of any fire system is directly linked to the quality of its installation. Several manufacturers, including Advanced,


26 MARCH 2018 www.frmjournal.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60