search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FOCUS


Facilities management


In short, the FM professional needs to obtain


as much information as possible about the fire engineering strategy of the building, if only to prioritise the importance of preventative maintenance for different building systems. This applies even where the FM contractor isn’t directly involved with the FRAs for a building. Of course, in one sense they will always have some involvement, to ensure that fire safety is appropriately assessed and protected for their own staff and contractors.


Managing contractors


One practical issue for the FM professional is how fire safety contractors are managed on a site. There are those who may be described as the primary contractors, for example those dealing with the maintenance of fire detection systems, including control panels. There could be contractors who inspect fire extinguishers or other firefighting systems which also need regular maintenance.


Ensuring these contractors meet their appointments – and then properly document their inspections and any remedial work – is a high priority. This may sound obvious but the serious consequences of not ensuring that these are completed on time can be lost within a wider range of preventative maintenance routines to be monitored. The other group of contractors might be described as secondary to fire safety, but can have serious implications for the fire strategy of


30 FEBRUARY 2019 www.frmjournal.com


the building. These include those involved in electrical, gas, air conditioning and ventilation management. Their work can have a serious influence on the level of fire risk in a building, and this means their inspections need to be carried out as scheduled, as – for example – slippage can have a wider safety implication. The same cautionary note can apply to fire drills and cannot be something that just drifts onto the next scheduled date. It is common to find all manner of reasons to delay them, but this needs the formal acceptance of all parties responsible for fire safety.


Running away?


On some sites, especially those which have stormwater drainage, and where gulleys lead to natural egress points, such as fields or rivers rather than just to mains drainage, fire water runoff should be a consideration by the FM contractor. Usually, the occupier of the site is responsible for fire water runoff as a pollutant rather than the fire and rescue service (FRS) as is sometimes imagined. FRAs for the site should consider if there is any particular environmental risk from fire water runoff and, if so, how it would be mitigated. At a very high risk site, various engineering solutions might be proposed, including interceptor tanks or bunds. In any event, a drainage plan needs to be created if one cannot be found, to properly assess and mitigate the risk. The advice of the FM professional is likely to be sought on this point.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60