search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Facilities management Once again, channels of communication


are essential because changes in management for individual tenants can lead to problems, such as not complying with evacuation drills or perhaps causing repeated accidental actuations of fire signals. In addition, there can be issues with common parts management, for example a tenant leaving obstructions, or their own contractors creating a fire safety hazard by carrying out an act that is unsafe, for instance. Ideally, the contract should recognise that the landlord will support the facilities manager when local consultation with a tenant is not successful on a fire safety matter. Where the contract is not so clear cut, the FM professional still needs to ensure that the matter is raised with the landlord’s representatives, to agree a strategy for dealing with such an issue.


All hot air?


If the FM contractor assumes all or most of the fire safety duties of a site, this may include obtaining fire risk assessments (FRAs), or completing these jointly with the landlord or their managing agent, which means that all parties can contribute to the risk assessment approach to fire safety, including life safety evacuation and fire detection systems.


Risk assessment is intrinsically connected with the original fire engineering design within the building, and this is not always fully appreciated when FRAs are reviewed. For example, if a building was designed with smoke and heat exhaust ventilation (SHEV) type ventilation systems, this will be directly connected with the building’s fire strategy, particularly for evacuation as it will extract smoke away from traffic routes. In a case where the landlord has changed since the original site was developed, they may not have access to all the plans. In my experience, even with modern buildings, the full monitoring and evaluation plans, ventilation strategies and drainage plans may not always be available. In multi site buildings, it can be a particular


challenge when tenants have their own fire strategies. These may or may not conflict with the fire strategy for the building. Some landlords are proactive in checking these points, and others will let tenants do their own thing. This is something the facilities manager needs to be aware of, and then adjust their own life safety approach, including updating the landlord’s representatives when any tenants appear to be compromising fire safety through inaction or, on occasion, by high risk activities such as a tenant’s contractor working on demise based electrical wiring that could have an impact on fire detection systems.


FOCUS


www.frmjournal.com FEBRUARY 2019


29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60